Jump to content
North Side Baseball

minnesotacubsfan

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    25,068
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Chicago Cubs Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by minnesotacubsfan

  1. He's an UFA. and they wont resign him? I guess thats my bigger question
  2. Judon is intriguing, but how are you going to get Jones out of Dallas?
  3. Theres nothing wrong with the double FS, a SS would be a run stuffer/TE cover guy anyway. Considering the D is ranked #6 against the run, they aren't missing the SS spot. The run D has suffered more form missing Hicks IMO (and really, so have the INT numbers). I'd like to see what Ha-Ha would resign for. They need someone besides Mack and Hicks on the D line. the rest is all O-line, back up RB, TE, and QB1A.
  4. yea, no thanks.
  5. This plus Mack will not be invisible, his ineffectiveness this season is combination of many things - him sucking, Hicks injury, etc. - but, it's not because of injury. He'll come back in a big way next year. How much of it may be due to scheme change? The D has taken a slight step back that could be attributed to going from Fangio to Pagano, but Mack has absolutely disappeared
  6. You're probably correct, more a statement of frustration, fumbling, stumbling Bears can't get out of their own way, Mitch misses open receivers, they drop TD passes (Ridley), all the usual [expletive], is aggravating. I don't think it's fair to classify that as a drop for Ridley. That was a crazy play and he may or may not have even been able to get his feet inbounds. Yea, that would have been a crazy catch.
  7. overall, the benefit of placing 3rd is real. much easier schedule then this year
  8. horsefeathers YEA FUMBLE
  9. well, that was pointless
  10. nice pick play horsefeathering refs
  11. this might be our best offseason signing this year
  12. pee-AIR LOO-eee and GRIP it and RIP IT just because https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VZysEDVgDCA
  13. Man, I still don't follow your logic. A 10-6 Bears would still be more likely to make the PO. He isn't saying that. Obviously, if the Bears win all their games, their chances of making the playoffs increases. He is saying that if you simulated the season, say, 100 times, and then would looked at all of the instances where the Bears were in the playoffs, there would be more instances of the Bears being 9-7 and in than 10-6 and in, merely because going 3-0 is very unlikely. yes, this Wrigley. But the Bears going 2-1 likely means they lose to GB, and horsefeathers that. We're winning on Sunday.
  14. horsefeathers TRADING BRYANT YOU GUYS horsefeathers THAT ALL DAY AND ALL NIGHT STOP TALKING LALALALALALALALALALALALA
  15. at this point I want the Bears to finish 3-0 or 2-1 and Trubisky to finish with a passer rating north of 90 (hes at 87 now). If we dont make the playoffs, that outcome will give me some hope for next year.
  16. What an absolutely batcrap proposal among a trio of insane proposals FUCCCCCCCCCK THAT horsefeathers
  17. I feel the same, but beating Auburn would be far better for the Gophers then beating Tennessee would be for Indiana. Best of luck, would love a Big Ten sweep
  18. thats STUNNING I stand corrected
  19. It also took at least 3 points off the board (2nd & 7, from the 19) when the team was down 7, after allowing several 3rd down conversions on the previous drive while losing its best ILB. You can hold the INT against him while still acknowledging he played well. I'm willing to excuse some bad throws/INTs, but rarely are they ok in the red zone. Sent from my moto e5 supra using Tapatalk where are you getting 3 points? With Piniero, that's not a given
×
×
  • Create New...