Jump to content
North Side Baseball

minnesotacubsfan

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    25,057
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    4

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by minnesotacubsfan

  1. I thought Smith was smart? If so, he’ll horsefeathering retire
  2. 3000 yrds 2 years in a row, already as good as Cutty. Not that that says much Beat Minny 4 games in a row I guess those are positives
  3. White Nick has mad Danny irrelevant
  4. I'm sorry, I meant on target and on target % the Bears are in the top 1/2, which is surprising. They are very low (bottom 1/3) in bad throws %, however GB is near the top of that category. puzzling There are throw aways and bad throws - think Rodgers ability to ground the ball without being called for intentional grounding has anything to do with those stats? I have no idea how they judge them. but Trubisky does have a knack of hitting receivers well. whats weird is earlier in the season he was air mailing throws over everyone, and it seemed like he did it a lot. the stats def don't rhyme with the eye test
  5. thanks, drop % is what I was looking for, Bears are in the top 1/2, but hardly top 10. Also, look at thrown away, New England has like 40, the Bears dead last at 5. youch however, bad throws and bad throw % has the Bears in top 1/2. Not what I would have expected I would have thought they'd be in the top 10 in those categories still, not very good. I'm sorry, I meant on target and on target % the Bears are in the top 1/2, which is surprising. They are very low (bottom 1/3) in bad throws %, however GB is near the top of that category. puzzling
  6. but at what rate per attempt? Found this - https://www.pro-football-reference.com/years/2019/advanced.htm perhaps, the above only includes currently active players per team? thanks, drop % is what I was looking for, Bears are in the top 1/2, but hardly top 10. Also, look at thrown away, New England has like 40, the Bears dead last at 5. youch however, bad throws and bad throw % has the Bears in top 1/2. Not what I would have expected
  7. but at what rate per attempt?
  8. sure. Lovie did this, but with the defensive side instead
  9. I could see that. Reid's teams always seem to collapse in the playoffs, and although their D is playing better of late they are still middle of the road
  10. Cohen is a morom
  11. No horsefeathers. Kick the field goal already
  12. Trubisky was a runner, Mahomes was not. You cant SPEAR someone regardless of pos
  13. Lets see: its ok to spear Trubisky but if Mahomes stumbles over his own horsefeathering feet, PF horsefeathers THE NFL
  14. By....who? Who do you think is in charge here? The owners, in collusion. But I don’t think Ricketts has a lot of pull among them as fairly recent member of the club. oh [expletive]. they are greedy, self serving old white folk. nothing more to see then that
  15. only in terms of hr's, and only by 3, and perhaps defensively. But he isn't an improvement over Nick unless he's drastically cheaper
  16. Shall we say; Puigshine
  17. Yes, I think its clear OG and edge are the biggest needs on this team
  18. He's an UFA. and they wont resign him? I guess thats my bigger question
  19. Judon is intriguing, but how are you going to get Jones out of Dallas?
  20. Theres nothing wrong with the double FS, a SS would be a run stuffer/TE cover guy anyway. Considering the D is ranked #6 against the run, they aren't missing the SS spot. The run D has suffered more form missing Hicks IMO (and really, so have the INT numbers). I'd like to see what Ha-Ha would resign for. They need someone besides Mack and Hicks on the D line. the rest is all O-line, back up RB, TE, and QB1A.
  21. yea, no thanks.
  22. This plus Mack will not be invisible, his ineffectiveness this season is combination of many things - him sucking, Hicks injury, etc. - but, it's not because of injury. He'll come back in a big way next year. How much of it may be due to scheme change? The D has taken a slight step back that could be attributed to going from Fangio to Pagano, but Mack has absolutely disappeared
  23. You're probably correct, more a statement of frustration, fumbling, stumbling Bears can't get out of their own way, Mitch misses open receivers, they drop TD passes (Ridley), all the usual [expletive], is aggravating. I don't think it's fair to classify that as a drop for Ridley. That was a crazy play and he may or may not have even been able to get his feet inbounds. Yea, that would have been a crazy catch.
  24. overall, the benefit of placing 3rd is real. much easier schedule then this year
×
×
  • Create New...