Does everyone ignore Bedard's injury history based on his one dominating year where he was also injured? You know, Rich Hill was 27 this year, and Bedard was 27 in 2006 (his first non-injured year and, also, his only non-injured year in his 4 full year career) and their numbers weren't too far off. (insert "Bedard is in a harder division" counter defense here) I'd be too wary of giving up too much for a guy who has only been able to stay healthy for one year this far in his career when we could be sitting on someone who has the potential to put up similar numbers. I'm not saying Bedard wouldn't be a good addition, but giving up so much for him just seems like a big mistake. And since they won't expect anything but the best for him, meaning Hill or Pie, I say stay away. I'm not a huge fan of Blanton, but I don't think he'd cost nearly as much as Bedard, and I personally would rather see Z-Lilly-Hill-Blanton-Marquis/Dempster/Whoever other than Z-Bedard-Lilly-Marquis-Dempster/whoever (and yes, I'm aware of Blanton's home/road splits). But that's just me