I don't know that it's bad, but it's probably the worst of the available options. This. Liriano is fine, but there are better options available. I kinda view him as a consolation prize for missing out on McCarthy or Marcum. Nice to have at the end of the day, but not what you really wanted. Understandable. But if there are better options, it also means there is a bigger market for those options. The most difficult part in getting guys like Marcum or McCarthy to come here is not really the money. It's trying to convince them to sign for just one year while also just being a 3-month rental. They can sign where they want for one year and go to a good team. So, it can be a tough sell. That's why it's too bad Haren was injured. It was perfect. The Cubs wouldn't be actively trying to sign any of those guys to one year deals. It'd be a waste of time to even try. I can't imagine the Cubs would be offering anything less than a 2 year guaranteed contract to McCarthy or Marcum. For their talents I'd have to assume they may attempt a 2 year w/ 3rd option year at a minimum. That style of contract seems to make the most sense for the Cubs, IMO. They can bounce back this season and have an attractive pitcher with 2 possible years left of control, or they struggle this year, bounce back the following year and then you've got qa guy who could still be under control for another season (or could be let go minimizing the risk of obtaining that pitcher). Or they're terrible both years and you cut ties after the 2nd year of the experiment. From the Cubs standpoint, that type of deal makes the most sense with the way they're building the team right now. If they're handing out 1 year deals those are going to filler like Joe Blanton who provide no remarkable upside whatsoever.