Jump to content
North Side Baseball

Derwood

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    88,611
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    93

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Chicago Cubs Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by Derwood

  1. i'm less annoyed with Buck/McCarver than am I with how utterly horrible the FOX games look on my TV. The graphics are all out of focus, the picture is really dark (you can't even see the face of the batter). Horrible
  2. this thread is a dictionary definition of a circular argument. this is the thread that never ends, it just goes on and on....
  3. I'm pretty sure the Marlins had better pitching
  4. no jimmy rollins anywhere. i love it
  5. YES!
  6. words words words numbers PROFIT?
  7. Times grounded out 4-3. G.R.I.T.ty players excel at doing that
  8. my parents just came back from Cape Cod and they said it was just over run with Patriots/Red Sox stuff. Thing is, those teams are all they have in Massachusetts, Connecticut, Rhode Island, Vermont, New Hampshire, Maine.....
  9. Notre Dame benches Clausen for Sharpley this week (as per ESPN Bottom Line)
  10. i'm happy for Todd Helton
  11. again, i think naming names is going to damn the league an union more than the players. the only way they can name names is if a) the player(s) fessed up to Mitchell, b) they have records of positive test results from the playing days of the player(s) and/or c) they have testimony from those who provided the drugs (which seems to be the least reliable). If there are test results, that's a huge problem for the league, as it would come to light that positive tests for steroids were ignored.
  12. He was pretty good with the Cards. true, 110 ERA+, 1.2 WHIP. Really think that will last?
  13. it's clear that it's impossible to make an objective assessment on a player who you know personally
  14. i can't believe this thread is still going on.
  15. that, or have no one without a loss and add even more teams to the mix
  16. expand the roster, lose the DH. Or, get this, don't have players who can't field!
  17. Meredith? Phyllis? don't qualify as "hittable"
  18. oh, nevermind, i understand why this won't happen now. /loose lips sink ships
  19. and because they are michigan. I don't care because I think ratings are ridiculous (how is Oregon now ahead of Cal?) but I do think Michigan gets bias. Oregon lost by 7 at home to a very good Cal team. Cal lost at home by 3 to an average Oregon State team. Cal's loss is much worse than Oregon's is. EDIT: Let me add that I do understand the other side of the argument - that Cal beat Oregon - and that I'm torn on which way I would rank them. I was just making an argument for putting Oregon ahead of Cal. right, one could say "Oregon lost to a Cal team that lost to a mediocre Oregon State team", which hurts Oregon
  20. Are those all Nike schools? maybe, but Penn State is a Nike school too
  21. if i learned nothing else this past week, it's that the Pac 10 has the hands down ugliest set of school uniforms ever. Oregon will always be worst, but Cal's were atrocious, USC's look like Jr. High uni's, Washington State's all-reds look like pajamas....FTH are the designers thinking?
×
×
  • Create New...