Seriously, the hand wringing over this is incredible. I thought about it today while reading the free paper that had the chris brown story on its cover. The media and all the talking heads are completely blowing over the fact that he beat the crap out of his girlfriend, saying things like "we can't judge" and "we weren't there". That's a much bigger story than ARod doing roids, yet the blowhards are out in force on this one. It's even more amazing when you consider pop stars are so much more popular than athletes. I'd also say steroids use has been rampant in sports since at least the 60's. Baseball may have been a little late to the game, but I guarantee they were popular in the 80's, if not earlier. I knew a guy who dealt them, and used to use them, who was a minor league pitcher in the late 80's. I agree for the most part, but I think "we weren't there" is pretty valid in the Chris Brown-Rihanna situation. I'm not defending Brown, but he probably just didn't beat up his girlfriend out of thin air. There are a limited set of circumstances where a man can punch a woman in the face. They're pretty limited, but they're there. We'll have to see what happens when the truth comes out. For A-Rod, there were no absolutely extenuating circumstances whatsoever that led to him taking roids. (And yes, I don't even care about A-Rod or steriods anymore). Seriously? And what would those be? "We weren't there" is valid in the sense that maybe a mugger beat the crap out of her while Chris Brown sat in the corner and soiled himself, so let's not rush to judgement. If you accept that it was Chris Brown delivering the beatdown, then I can't think of any situation in which it was acceptable to do so. There may have been a reason why, but that doesn't make it OK.