Yeah, but, like, who cares? He isn't helping the Cubs this year - no one is - and his $18 million next year could almost certainly be put to better use. Unless you believe he's going to reverse course next year (which is not inconceivable given how dominant he was in the second half last year), I just can't be too upset about losing Z's hypothetical production for 2012. NOBODY is saying that if someone wants to pick up the 18 mil that we shouldnt let them have him. The general consensus is that we shouldnt have to pay him more than 1/3 of his salary to pitch for someone else unless were getting some top prospects. If some team really wants to pick up the remainder of his contract, theres probabbly not a poster on this board who wouldnt happily drive him to the airport. Its similar to the Soriano situation. Sure, it would be better if we didnt have to pay him,but considering the production you get, if you do have to pay him anyway, it should be for us. I think you're wrong about that. For instance, anyone that believes that the Cubs can contend next year will disagree. Any equation that has the Cubs contending next year includes Z pitching like he has in the past. Or trading Z to a contender now, getting some prospects and then trading for King Felix this offseason. There are a variety of scenarios where Z gets traded that would still work for contending in 2012. To me, it depends on what the Cubs feel Z has left in the tank. If they feel he's not ever going to be the pitcher he was in the past again, then they should trade him while the value is still relatively high. If they feel that he can still have a second half like he did last year, then they should keep him and have one less gap in the offseason. Id love for that to happen, but if the Mariners are smart, they'll keep Felix as long as they can. him and Pineda could be the most dominant 1-2 SP combo in baseball in a few years.