Jump to content
North Side Baseball

Backtobanks

Old-Timey Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    7,298

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by Backtobanks

  1. Backtobanks
    I didn't post that they're expecting Marte to be an upgrade in RF, which I would assume means that he's unavailable too. The point of the original post is that nobody's giving up the top pitchers at the trade deadline without getting back at least one top pitching prospect.
  2. Backtobanks
    Phil Rogers in today's Tribune wrote that the Pirates have inquired about Hamels, Greinke, Lester, Dempster, and Garza, but Cole, Taillon, and Heredia are not available. I would imagine they don't get many calls returned.
  3. Backtobanks
    Aside from this, many 3B prospects end up as major league 2B. Man Baez at second is exciting. The Cubs are years away too. Baez was drafted as a SS, but his size and power potential project him to play 3B.
  4. Backtobanks
    what 3b prospect is that? 2 questions: 1. The FO has just started looking in earnestat minor league players at the lower levels of almost every farm system? 2. What about Baez?
  5. Backtobanks
    Yes his BBs would go up, but his slugging and RBI total would go way down. I'm sure one reason he's batting 3rd (and not 4th or 5th) is so teams won't pitch around Castro.
  6. Backtobanks
    $44 of $46 million? There better be a top prospect in that kind of deal, that's absurd to get next to nothing in return for giving Soriano away for $1 million per year for the rest of the contract. Yeah if there isn't a decent prospect involved, he's more valuable as protection for Rizzo in the lineup.
  7. Backtobanks
    Yeah, while I don't want to pretend that I know it's still a problem for him, I don't really want to say it's definitely not a problem either. I don't think it's all that far-fetched to think he plays it safe and avoids the major media markets. When you're going to make that much money, you might as well play it safe if there are any issues. He seems like the kind of guy who would leave money on the table to play in a place where he's comfortable.
  8. Backtobanks
    As someone posted many pages ago, Soriano leaving means Rizzo loses his protection in the lineup.
  9. Backtobanks
    I think Greinke ends up with a city like Atlanta, Baltimore, St. Louis, Milwaukee, etc. and avoids the big-city stress of NY, Chicago, & LA .
  10. Backtobanks
    This is dumb, even for you. And this defense of Amaro is weird and dumb. I don't think SCS is defending Amaro, just pointing out that there are similarities with the Phillies and what is happened with the Red Sox under Theo. Both GMs came into a good situation, made the teams better, had very high payrolls, and now are suffering with expensive players that are aging and getting injured.
  11. Backtobanks
    No real surprise, LaHair doesn't fit into our long-term plans and does have some value to other teams needing a LH platoon power bat. Add to that the fact that he's cheap for a long time certainly adds to his value.
  12. Backtobanks
    There's no way Jed is on the phone with another GM and says "sounds good, let me ask my boss." If that's how it goes, the other GMs would just talk to Theo. Jed knows what's acceptable and what's not or he wouldn't have the job. Of course Jed wouldn't say "sounds good, let me ask my boss." , he would say "I'll get back to you." When Theo was hired, he was given complete autonomy over all baseball operations and decisions. Also, let's not forget that Theo could not leave the Red Sox for a parallel position (GM), which is why he was given the promotional title with the Cubs. Make no mistake about it Theo is in charge of making any serious deals that will be made. That doesn't make a lot of sense. Jed goes into discussions knowing the targets and what he can give up. If something is outside that range, I'm sure he discusses it with Theo. But the GM is not just a glorified secretary. Why doesn't it make sense? Any GM with a prized trade chip would ask for as much as possible and probably not accept immediately anything less, thus calling back later. Looking at TT's post, people know who is making the deals for the Cubs. As for Jed being a "glorified secretary", it's more like he's the assistant GM.
  13. Backtobanks
    There's no way Jed is on the phone with another GM and says "sounds good, let me ask my boss." If that's how it goes, the other GMs would just talk to Theo. Jed knows what's acceptable and what's not or he wouldn't have the job. Of course Jed wouldn't say "sounds good, let me ask my boss." , he would say "I'll get back to you." When Theo was hired, he was given complete autonomy over all baseball operations and decisions. Also, let's not forget that Theo could not leave the Red Sox for a parallel position (GM), which is why he was given the promotional title with the Cubs. Make no mistake about it Theo is in charge of making any serious deals that will be made.
  14. Backtobanks
    I wonder how much Theo is actually involved in that? Is it like a "Co-GM" situation? Or do they just meet about things and then Theo lets Jed actually do the trade haggling? Does Jed have to run a big trade through Theo first? Just curious about the logistics. Based on an interview I saw/read earlier this season with Jed Hoyer, he stated that they basically split the duties based upon which one has a better relationship with the GM they are dealing with. It also sounded like they try to build a consensus on decisions. I think it is safe to assume that Theo has final say. So we all agree that Jed will do the initial haggling and then Theo will finalize the deal. Kind of like a car salesman and the boss. I doubt that's how it works. Jed and Theo probably set the acceptable range at the start and modify if necessary but the idea of Jed hemming and hawing before going to the boss for approval is ridiculous. I'm sure Jed wouldn't make a deal without consulting with Theo before finalizing it.
  15. Backtobanks
    I wonder how much Theo is actually involved in that? Is it like a "Co-GM" situation? Or do they just meet about things and then Theo lets Jed actually do the trade haggling? Does Jed have to run a big trade through Theo first? Just curious about the logistics. Based on an interview I saw/read earlier this season with Jed Hoyer, he stated that they basically split the duties based upon which one has a better relationship with the GM they are dealing with. It also sounded like they try to build a consensus on decisions. I think it is safe to assume that Theo has final say. So we all agree that Jed will do the initial haggling and then Theo will finalize the deal. Kind of like a car salesman and the boss.
  16. Backtobanks
    Yeah, I remember the Yankees trying to convince everybody to take him in a trade.
  17. Backtobanks
    I don't think Theo is ready to spend big this offseason, so that eliminates Hamels. and yet theo knows that he has no passable arms and the only way he's going to get them is if he signs them in free agency. signing hamels and/or greinke in the offseason is the best bet to be ready for contention in a year or two. pass on either of them and you're going to have to deplete the farm to do that. you're acting as if they're looking for one-year deals. Garza, Greinke, and Hamels are all the same age (within 2 months). Theo might as well extend Garza instead of spending an extra $50-$60 million on Hamels. Also, the Cubs are nowhere near contention in a year and probably not in two years unless Jackson, Vitters, and a few others come up and hit like Rizzo. I think the 2013/2014 offseason will be when Theo will be spending and/or making a blockbuster deal to help immediately.
  18. Backtobanks
    I don't think Theo is ready to spend big this offseason, so that eliminates Hamels.
  19. Backtobanks
    Anybody we get from Garza/Dempster trades has to be better than Volstad and Coleman, even if they're 19 year old pitchers in A ball.
  20. Backtobanks
    Obviously the future rotation is going to be dependent on what young pitchers we get in the Garza, Dempster, Soriano, Lahair, and Soto trades because there isn't much to look forward to in the minors or free agency. I think somewhere in the future (2-3 years), Theo is going to have to package a bunch of our prospects and make a blockbuster deal for a TOR guy. It's hard to predict the future, but right now things look pretty dismal in the pitching department.
  21. Backtobanks
    That's about as win/win as it gets! Don't worry though, he'll get plenty of starts once Demps traded. =D> Him or Casey Coleman.
  22. Backtobanks
    Just curious since I was born in '84 so I don't know how bad that was. Was it as bad as '03? I was in college and I remember after the whole Bartman/A Gonz fiasco, my dorm basically turned into a riot. Kids were throwing stuff out the window or into the hallway and I'm pretty sure I've never heard so much cussing as I did that night. For those who lived through both, which was worse? '84 or 2003? Don't forget 1969.
  23. Backtobanks
    Part Petco, Part Alonso not being good. .837 MiLB OPS while being old for some levels. 36 HR in 1300+ MiLB PA. Never understood the hype. I don't believe Alonso isn't a good hitter. As you pointed out Petco is an offensive disaster.
  24. Backtobanks
    No, but I had the Cubs at about 30 wins.
  25. Backtobanks
    You help the psyche of the hitters and ruin the psyche of the pitchers.
×
×
  • Create New...