I'm not all that high on Singler's pro prospects, but him and Korver really aren't all that similar They are both long range shooters, although Singler actually shoots worse from the perimeter. Neither have any ball handling skills worth anything, they thrive off catching and shooting. Singler may be passable on defense and might rebound better. He's regressed as a rebounder however; and I've read that his defensive skills won't translate well, especially with his lack of lateral quickeness, length and athleticism. I don't know anything about his passing game but since he can't drive or post up I don't see that being very valuable. They're both gonna be role players that run off screens and take jumpshots. And Korver is better at it. I honestly don't know the two all that well and I'm sure there are better comparisons. I've heard the most agreed upon one is Kiki Vandeweghe, so obviously he's different from Korver in a # of ways. But to say they're not similar at all is not accurate. Korver is a much better shooter, obviously. Singler cannot even compare to Korver in that regard. However, Singler has just about everything else on Korver. He will be a better defender and will be a much better rebounder. Singler has about 20 pounds and an inch and a half on Korver, so he has the size to guard the opposing three. Singler can contribute without making his shots in a way that Korver cannot. If Singler could shoot like Korver, he would be a better asset. From Singler's DraftExpress profile I can't imagine reading a similar quote about Korver. I really don't think that Singler will be much of an NBA player, but I think the comparison is off-base. Probably having to do more-so with their looks than their play. I literally just said I know they have a # of things different about them. Like not that long ago. I just don't buy that they're not similar at all. The reason I made the comparison is because they're both role players who are good at catching and shooting. Singler struggled from long range but has been reported to be very fluid and mechanically sound. He was actually consistent and accurate at mid-range. It has nothing to do with them looking similar, I just compared what the most useful thing Singler will bring to his team. Since that team was the Bulls, I felt it was redundant to have another catch and shoot player. I'm no expert on the Bulls though, so I'm probably wrong there. Think they should get someone who can penetrate besides Rose. I do know there are multiple better options at that spot. Singler's extra value from rebounding and defense is really not impressive and not worth a 1st round pick. His extra size doesn't mean much. He's soft, slow and has a crappy wingspan. The defense and rebounding coming from Singler will still be subpar at the NBA level. I would be surprised if he was mediocre at either one, maybe rebounding.