Calling calling the win over Clemson a win against a top 10 team is legitimately true. Calling a win against Clemson a quality win is entirely fine. Don't diss on Maryland who beat by everyone's favorite alignment of stars leads you to: Maryland over Cal over Michigan State over Notre Dame over Michigan over top 10 Wisconsin. I'm not saying Maryland is very good, but they do have more quality wins than Missouri and of course more than Illinois (Go Louisiana Lafayette!) You're right, I am a supporter of margin of victory. However, it's less important against weak teams, BUT if Missouri was as good as Alabama we would have expected them to beat Illinois by 19, SE Missouri St by 57 and Buffalo by 28. They were a TD below all of those. Granted they could have done that against SE Missouri St if they wanted. It just goes to show that we expected them to be winning like this, and in the only game against a decent opponent (Illinois) they were about a little over a TD worse than expected, which is important considering thats the best information we can go on. Clemson while certainly overrated at the beginning is better than the Illini and not to mention they went on the road and beat Georgia. Missouri hasn't left the state yet. No worries, I'll be at the UT game when Missouri is taken down though.