it wasn't a three year straight average I averaged three variables. 2005, 2006 and then their PECOTA projection of 2007 (which is going to be used in the new PECOTAs for regression purposes) i can do a weighted of the last two. weighting 2006 as 50%, 2005 as 25% and their 2007 projection as 25%. .272 Lugo .291 Soriano .311 Drew .226 Izturis (i threw out his 06 due to small sample size) .252 Pie we get: +34.4 Izturis ----> Lugo +33.2 Pie ----> Soriano +46.2 Pie ----> JD Drew for 122 games Quite a bit. They could still break up the 17 mil theyre giving up and give 10 or so to Lugo and then split the other 11 mil between two decent 2Bers and CFers and easily come out better. Well if they signed Lugo too, of course. But at that point what about DeRosa at 2B to Ray Durham? It's a cheaper upgrade. Using the same analysis as I used above +27.8 Mark DeRosa ----> Durham +36.0 Cubs 2006 2B ----> Durham Since Soriano + DeRosa costs about 21 mil, Durham wants 9 if i rememeber correctly. So doing that and we can still spend 12 million at CF. Say five million of that is on Dave Roberts (+22.6 runs). Roberts + Durham would be over fifty runs what we had last season and probably would cost 7 million dollars less to pump into our rotation, or taking on a contract in RF for Jacque Jones. The Cubs have so many holes, spending all your resources to plug one isn't efficient.