No I haven't seen him play SS regularly and there's probably good reason he hasn't. Anyways, you're saying that my opinion based on word of mouth is bad, but then making an argument about his defense based on six games you've seen? In terms of grading defense, here's where I would rank various methods. Actual Skill Level! Stats developed by Beane and other UBER ML teams *UZR included Probability based methods BP Methods ZR Scouts Eye Es, FPCT, RF, etc TruffleShuffle's eyesight based on 6 games. As you can see, the other reports certainly carry more weight than your six or seven games on TV. His .250 EqA on PECOTA!? WOW WE SHOULD ALL WANT TWO FIFTY EQAS. Fonte over Cedeno at 2B wouldn't be a dumb move. Fonte over Cedeno at SS would be. You're basing your argument on his strong performance at Iowa!? Awesome! Going into the season he was a career .281/.364/.432 hitter in AAA. He's been outstanding this year, no doubt. Ronny Cedeno's Two Seasons In AAA: 2005 - .355/.403/.518 2007 - .347/.446/.537 Statistically, both of those performances are better than Fontenot's flukish start to the 2007 season in Iowa. To base your argument off of Fonte's AAA numbers when theyre significantly inferior to Cedeno's AAA numbers isn't going to win you very many arguments.