tadowdaddy

Must be better than the Missouri of the Big 12. Hell, you guys can't even make up your minds as to if you want to leave or not. It's pathetic. Just do something already. Must feel shameful to be behind KSU in both Football and Basketball. Dunno what your "Kansas State of the SEC" quote means, but you finished behind us in Football for about 12 years up until 2004 or so, and continue to finish behind us in basketball since Huggins arrival. Must make you feel good to be so dilusional. I'd be jealous too if a 72 year old coach kicked my ass and showed what a scam your football program is. Point is, you can't beat KSU in athletics, even with better talent. Think of where you'll be with Fla, Arkansas, LSU, Bama, Tennessee etc. Have fun trying to recruit Texas too should you guys leave. I hope you do. WVA adds more than Mizzou ever did. Same WT towns, better athletic programs... bye bye.

The funny thing is, read the quotes from Fowler, they wanted to come to Manhattan (biggest Gameday crowd ever was there). Chokelahoma losing at home to a team KSU beat at TT kept that from happening. That being said, either one of 2 things will happen this weekend: Oklahoma will come in and be down without the possibility of playing for a National title and KSU will win, or most likely, OU will be pissed off and will come in and kick our butt. Can't wait to see which way it goes. Let's be real - they just wanted any excuse to not have to go to Manhattan. Believe what you wish and have fun being a back end of the pack team in the SEC.

The funny thing is, read the quotes from Fowler, they wanted to come to Manhattan (biggest Gameday crowd ever was there). Chokelahoma losing at home to a team KSU beat at TT kept that from happening. That being said, either one of 2 things will happen this weekend: Oklahoma will come in and be down without the possibility of playing for a National title and KSU will win, or most likely, OU will be pissed off and will come in and kick our butt. Can't wait to see which way it goes.

Or they end up at Iowa State! :)

Very Happy Day! I just told my wife, be prepared for me getting the baseball package again next year. I let it go this year. Baseball for some reason became unimportant to me. Well, I'm happy to say that this has me interested again! Can't wait to see what happens this off season!

It sure as hell seems that way doesn't it!

We won't win by 50, but hopefully should win by 3 touchdowns.

vegas doesn't lose money, folks. They did on the KSU game... I HOPE Mizzou trash goes to the SEC. They'll be lucky to be a middle of the pack team there in either main revenue generating sport.

Or due to suckage.... He's been awful for 2 years.

Entire team is available here... make me an offer!

Seconded... congrats!

Baylor and RGIII this week, meh.. Not sure I will want to watch.

But last week wasn't the playoffs... we can't make the rule start prior to the actual playoffs.

Good luck to everyone.. Just a question... Arod is day to day, and has the + sign by him. If I don't play him until he comes back, I can swap him in for Moose can't I? We've been fine with swapping out day to day guys in the past. Just want to make sure.

I've lost my 7th start to the hurricane too for the week...

I do not understand why total points scored matters that much? This is a HEAD to HEAD league. You look to be just trying to find something else to bitch about as usual.

I think between two teams the first tiebreaker should be H2H and the second tiebreaker should be totals points in their matchups against each other. In three way ties go H2H if you can then go with total points. If H2H isn't your first tiebreaker then there really isn't any point of having a H2H league. this line of thinking makes no sense to me. it's a h2h league because we play each other every week. it's just as much a "points" league since that's how you win head to head matchups. So then what's the point? If it was a points league then the standings would be based on points, not record on H2H matchups. How can you call it a "win" in a H2H matchup if at the end of the season you throw that out and say even though you won the H2H matchup it doesn't count because your opponent that you are tied with scored more points during the entire season? To me, that makes no sense. and you don't "throw out" the win from the head to head matchup obviously. it still determines the standings. i just think it would be kind of silly for a team that outscores another by 700 points on the season or something to miss out on the playoffs because an inferior team luckily happened to have good weeks in 2 random weeks. Well, if that team has the same record as you do, and they beat you two times, how can they really be considered inferior just because they have less points than you do? Maybe you had 3 or 4 huge weeks compared to their average weeks that put you that far ahead of them points wise. The fact is, they have the same record as you and beat you twice, so they're not that much inferior to you.

I'm not thrilled about it due to the pitching matchups you'd have next week vs me and the fact that you've beaten me twice already this year.

Is this really necessary? is this? calm down, wasn't trying to start a riot. But you know that Brian isn't really going to put up with your [expletive]. It was a valid question.

Is this really necessary?

My memory is fuzzy on this, but can we substitute for suspended players mid-week ? I thought so, just like an injured player.

Victorino suspended, so Dunn in the lineup for a couple days until he comes back.

Shitty Adam Dunn out til Tuesday so Moreland in at 1b.

it use to be that we could trade, you announce who you put on waivers and anyone who claimed them could work out a trade with you. Stipulation being, if you trade for someone after the deadline, you have to keep them on your keeper roster for the next year.

Maybe we did away with this? I guess I don't remember.