since alvarez took over, they've been recruiting kids that fit their system. they realize they probably won't get a lot of gulf kids or california kids to fill skill positions so they get the big road-graders up front and base their team on size and strength. doing this probably won't allow them to compete with the faster SEC schools for the national championship year in and year out, but it will allow them to compete for the Big Ten title perrenially. If I'm not mistaken, the only Big Ten school that spends less money recruiting than Wisconsin , is Northwestern. makes sense. i don't think that either school really leaves the midwest very much in terms of recruiting. At least as of a couple of years ago, Minnesota spent the least amount of money on their football program in most categories. They're spending more on coaching now, though, so maybe that's changing. I'll have to find the link when I get home. Northwestern does recruit mostly in Illinois and Ohio, but they do quite a bit in Texas and California, as well. Pennsylvania, too, among others. And recruit talent is still probably less than 50% of the overall picture. Coaching, makeup, and how they fit into the system is the majority of it. EDIT: This year broke down like this Illinois - 5 Ohio - 5 Missouri - 2 Wisconsin - 1 Michigan - 2 Minnesota - 1 California - 1 Pennsylvania - 1 Kansas - 1 In 2006, though, for recruits outside of the midwest, they had 3 from Texas, 1 from Jersey, 1 from Georgia, 2 from Pennsylvania, 1 from Florida, and 1 from Arizona. Pretty much depends on the coaching staff changes.