What's the measure of decision making? Is it subjective? Just something you're saying you need to see more of, and then when he's successful, you'll claim his decision making improved? Or are you looking at some stats? Some fun with QB's with high interception rates: 1998 - Brett Favre - 551 passing attempts - interception rate 4.2% - In the Super Bowl 2000 - Trent Dilfer - 226 passing attempts - interception rate 4.9% - Won the Super Bowl 2006 - Rex Grossman - 480 passing attempts - interception rate 4.2% - In the Super Bowl Cutler's INT% with the Broncos 2006 - Jay Cutler - 137 passing attempt (rookie year, 5 games started) - interception rate 3.6% 2007 - Jay Cutler - 467 passing attempts - interception rate 3.0% 2008 - Jay Cutler - 616 passing attempts - interception rate 2.9% Now Cutler's INT% with the Bears 2009 - Jay Cutler - 555 passing attempts - interception rate 4.7% 2010 - Jay Cutler - 432 passing attempts - interception rate 3.7% 2011 - Jay Cutler - 314 passing attempts (injury) - interception rate 2.2% 2012 - Jay Cutler - 434 passing attempts - interception rate 3.2% So Cutler was doing decently in Denver, gets traded to a team with a crummy offense, and boom, he's crummy. Did Jay turn into a worse player? Maybe after playing on a crummy offense for 4 years, with a new offense practically every year, and getting crushed by defensive lines every night...maybe he has. But if anything, Cutler has very much improved with the Bears. Unless of course we're using some other arbitrary measure of "decisions making" and "elite super-bowlness".