Probability that can be mathematically measured != takes filtered through fan biases Hey, I'm the guy who was mad at Joe for how we used Chapman at the end of the 2016 WS when everyone was talking about results over process. It wasn't biased to say that the Cubs were likely going to win the division up until the very end based on all of the information that we had on hand. That it took Milwaukee winning 8 straight to close the season to win it is even more evidence of that. If that makes my take stupid, so be it. i think this is the overall point i've been trying to get at since early this summer here are some things i said were true then and guess what they held true 1 - the cubs, viewed with a wide-ass lens, were the best team before the season started and even with the difficulties they faced with injuries, performance, looked to be the best team 2- the brewers were also good 3 - the cubs had some problems that made them vulnerable 4 - sometimes weird horsefeathers happens and the team who is best in July or whatever doesn't finish on top and the response to those posts was LOOK AT THE RUN DIFFERENTIAL, LOL THEY'RE GONNA PLAY SCHOOP AT SECOND, WE HAVE THE BEST RECORD, NOTHING TO WORRY ABOUT. having other good teams in your division makes it really really stupid to jerk yourself off too soon. even the pollyanna dorks on here *knew* that the injuries and weird offense we were dealing with made us vulnerable but they ignored it because there was always something in the standings or hidden in some metric that made it impossible that we wouldn't win the division. And now it's October and we are potentially 1 game from the season ending and us looking at our coaching staff and roster and going oh lord we fucked up. And we're also one game away from being essentially right where we should be and everything is fine. Because that's how baseball works.