But why is Briggs an all pro? because he was an all-pro in 2005. you're telling me that i can't tell that vasher isn't a great player because i don't watch films? i can tell that he does a good job by watching the games, but i can tell that he's not physical enough because he misses a lot of tackles. i can also tell you that he lacks agility and speed to be an elite player. i also have a lot of respect for guys like hub arkush, who thinks that vasher is a pretty good player, but not irreplaceable by any standard. I absolutely despise this kind of argument. You are taking bits and pieces of a total post, then arguing against it as if that singular sentence was the ultimate point of the post. "because he was an all-pro" is simplistic and juvenile. I didnt ask why he was an all-pro. I used that sentence as an introduction into the body of my argument. "you're telling me that i can't tell that vasher isn't a great player because i don't watch films?" Im not saying YOU personally cannot tell whether Vasher is a good player or not, that is irrelevant. I believe that the top cornerback in the cover 2 is more important and harder to replace than the will linebacker. I think Vasher has superior agility, highlighted by his record breaking run against the 49ners in 2005. A cornerback's ability to cover receivers are more important than their ability to tackle. Is my observation wrong, and yours right? Maybe, but neither you or I have the expertise to make that determination. I value Hub Arkush as well, but I value Jerry Angelo's judgment much more considering he built or help built both Tampa's and Chicago's defense. But that is irrelevant also. Can the Bears afford to compensate Briggs and Harris and Vasher and Grossman....?