this is something i very rarely speculate on, but my gut feeling is that there are serious leadership problems in vancouver. they have way too much talent to just get slammed aside like this. they tend to whine more than other teams and resort to cheap play quickly. seems like there's a lack of accountability starting from the top. i don't have anything to base this on, which kind of makes it a dumb post, but that's just the feeling i get. losing 2 straight games in a row like that at home is straight up embarrassing. I don't have anything to base it on either, but it sure seems like you are dead on. Look at the guys who should be leaders on this team: the sisters, Luongo, Burrows. All of them have shown themselves to be mentally frail when things get tough. And it's not just losing their cool; they aren't producing like they should either. Until that late goal by Daniel (or was it Henrik -- who gives a [expletive]), Keith and Seabrook had the same number of points as the sisters in this series. That's ridiculous. So it's either the supposed leaders, Vigneault, or both. I blame the players at this point, though it will be Al's head getting lopped off next week if things wrap up like we hope they do tomorrow. He can preach to them until he is blue in the face that they need to keep their composure and can't give the Hawks constant chances on the power play, and in his postgame comments Luongo admitted that they had talked about it and made it a priority. But once the game starts and they get out there, if O'Brien can't stop playing like a moron, that's not the coach's fault. Lastly, I missed those comments Burish made yesterday about certain Canucks being "clowns." That's brilliant. Take a team rabid with anger, down in the series, swearing they are going to keep their composure, and poke them with a stick. That's what Burish did. Love it.