There was one dude saying he thought it would be a good idea before pretty much everyone else said they were against it, or didn't want to do it if it meant Soler was gone.
Everyone in the comment section praising it sounds like a huge pile of sycophantic buttholes. "Your stupid idea is so well-written I can't help but admire it!"
dough and batter and already formed bread heated and sweetened in different ways its all the same base Go eat some pizza dough for breakfast then. This is a bad path you've gone down.
No, no; this was before the Cubs had either of those guys (definitely before they had Russell). I could swear there was a thread here where several people said they wouldn't trade Castro for Harper.
I really wish the Cubs had bought "low" on Harper last year when he was disgruntled and the Nats thought he wasn't worth the trouble. i want to go back and laugh at all the people who said they wouldn't want him because i'm pretty sure i wasn't one of them Wasn't it a Castro for Harper-type of deal?