The Cubs going through an extended fallow period was not "caused" by being swept by the Cardinals. That's an insane conclusion. Huh? No one said it was caused by the Cardinals. Then what else is pointing out it "started" with a sweep by the Cardinals supposed to mean? If you're pointing out that it simply coincided with that series, then hey, we agree, but then it's a redundant point to make in the first place. By making it sound like you're worried about the Cubs facing them again, you sure seem to be placing a ton of weight on that sweep having something to do with them struggling for a while after that.