Jump to content
North Side Baseball

Sammy Sofa

Old-Timey Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    98,008

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    206

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by Sammy Sofa

  1. Sammy Sofa
    Cedeno flares out to 2nd.
  2. Sammy Sofa
    Base hit for Murton! Lee scores, DeRosa to 3rd.
  3. Sammy Sofa
    DeRosa walks, Lee on 2nd, 2 outs, Murton up.
  4. Sammy Sofa
    Yes, it's awesome that he got out of it like he did, but he did look like crap a lot in that half inning. Definitely peaks and valleys with Mr. Hill.
  5. Sammy Sofa
    Matthew Broderick looks so old.
  6. Sammy Sofa
    OK, minimum of damage...1 unearned run.
  7. Sammy Sofa
    Come on, Rich...get out of this...
  8. Sammy Sofa
    YES!!! What the hell did Rothschild say to Hill?!? "Hey, keep this up, Lou is going to eat you alive. Literally."
  9. Sammy Sofa
    Please, please, please....
  10. Sammy Sofa
    Hill hits the batter, bases loaded, no outs.
  11. Sammy Sofa
    1st and 3rd, no outs.
  12. Sammy Sofa
    Hill's not getting much down below chest level.
  13. Sammy Sofa
    Awesome start.
  14. Sammy Sofa
    YES. Please pitch on Friday, Kerry.
  15. Sammy Sofa
    Blah-blah-blah... I'm tired of people acting like it's some huge deal when every so often some celeb gets up there and butchers the song. It's a practice made famous (not even originally with the Cubs) by a guy who's legendary for basically sounding like a slobbering drunk almost every time who got on the air, so pardon me if I don't lose any sleep thinking that some sacred tradition is being desecrated. If anything, Santo is too good for the whole mess. I really don't care about the legacy of a sloppy ex-Cardinals and White Sox announcer. BRING ON THE CELEBS! Infinitely more entertaining.
  16. Sammy Sofa
    Whatever he wants. Even if he wanted it paid in babies.
  17. Sammy Sofa
    So people are convinced a Cuban-owned Cubs would have no chance competing with the Yankees money-wise?
  18. Sammy Sofa
    God, if he makes his debut this season when I'm at the game on Friday, I will likely squeal like a little girl.
  19. Sammy Sofa
    If Cuban ends up owning the team, I see no reason why they wouldn't go hard trying to either trade for him next year or sign him.
  20. Sammy Sofa
    Whatever. I'm Audi 5000, babe.
  21. Sammy Sofa
    STOP BRINGING UP WHAT YOU SEE WITH YOUR OWN EYES AS IF IT SOMEHOW TRUMPS ALL OTHER BASEBALL ANALYSIS.
  22. Sammy Sofa
    Yay, he gives up :!: Because there's nothing to respond to. You rarely answer any direct points and you pull "facts" out of thin air and refuse to budge on them even when shown to be mistaken or wrong. It's like debating with a brick wall. No that's like arguing with brinoch, who suggests that theriot would be caught more often if he attempted more often. And the only thing he uses to suggest his theory is that pitcher's would pay more attention. I've seen Riot run the bases and there are very frequent pick-off attempts and I don't think anyone would argue that. brinoch on the other hand still can't support his argument, so he simply quits. :D The crux of your argument seems to entail what you actually see. You can't see everything. Your argument is severely flawed. I happen to follow the Cubs quite often so the idea that what I see isn't good enough is retorical. Are you implying that I have bad eyesight? No, I'm flat out saying that your eyes can't show you everything pertaining to a player's numbers and abilities short of you seeing every game and every play and having multiple angles and reviewing tools to do so, and even then you're still going to get things wrong.
  23. Sammy Sofa
    Yay, he gives up :!: Because there's nothing to respond to. You rarely answer any direct points and you pull "facts" out of thin air and refuse to budge on them even when shown to be mistaken or wrong. It's like debating with a brick wall. No that's like arguing with brinoch, who suggests that theriot would be caught more often if he attempted more often. And the only thing he uses to suggest his theory is that pitcher's would pay more attention. I've seen Riot run the bases and there are very frequent pick-off attempts and I don't think anyone would argue that. brinoch on the other hand still can't support his argument, so he simply quits. :D The crux of your argument seems to entail what you actually see. You can't see everything. Your argument is severely flawed.
  24. Sammy Sofa
    Yay, he gives up :!: Because there's nothing to respond to. You rarely answer any direct points and you pull "facts" out of thin air and refuse to budge on them even when shown to be mistaken or wrong. It's like debating with a brick wall.
  25. Sammy Sofa
    Yet you still boast no evidence or fact to support your theory. Wow, talk about the pot calling the kettle black. You declaring something to be a "fact" is not presenting evidence.
×
×
  • Create New...