Jump to content
North Side Baseball

Sammy Sofa

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    98,021
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    206

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by Sammy Sofa

  1. I'd rather not see stats on your warm and fuzzy feelings. :D I think Gregg is pretty average for a closer. I'd like to upgrade, but I just don't think most would be worth the cost. Totally agree. In no way is Gregg someone I ideally want closing, or even necessarily on the team, but given the way things have shaped up he's average and serviceable enough to avoid having to overpay for an impact midseason bullpen acquisition. Scrambling to replace him or "fix" bullpen ultimately just wastes parts that can potentially be used to help the offense, which is going to lose the Cubs far more critical games than the bullpen would over the rest of the season.
  2. 2 days, 2 weeks, 2 months...what's the difference? Nobody thought he wasn't going to blow another save. When it happened is meaningless.
  3. Reliable enough, yes. I like how you bumped this as if people were saying Gregg would never blow another save for the rest of the season.
  4. He's not, and that's been broken down repeatedly for you, but feel free to keep flogging that.
  5. No offense to Olemisscub who posted the article, but what a load of crap. Totally disregarding the fact that at least one of the scant examples used by the author would hardly be considered performance enhancing ( I don't think many would champion being drunk as a performance enhancer), the author goes on to name a few players who " once took an amphetamine", or were using pain medication for an injury, in a span covering 100+ years, and tries to compare it to over 100 people who were proven to have used performance and body altering drugs in a single season. Not at all convincing in my opinion. He could have at least brought up Dock Ellis pitching while tripping on LSD or something. It's not a direct comparison. The piece is pointing out how the cheating "line" is still so blurry. Even if you're going to declare modern steroids and PED's to be the end-all-be-all, then where on the scale does cheating become OK? The article tries to make it a direct comparison, IMO. It's eloquently stated nonsense. I have no problem drawing a line between systematic, concentrated steroid use and a few uppers. It's not nonsense. Again, where is the line drawn? How much cheating is OK, and what cheating is OK?
  6. What's the timeline of those blown saves? Piecing it together: 04/10-Gregg 04/16-Heilman 04/18-Marmol 04/30-Marmol 05/08-Heilman 05/16-Heilman 05/25-Cotts 06/02-Gregg 06/07-Heilman 06/20-Marmol 06-23-Gregg The Cubs are 4-7 in games where there has been a blown save. Good relievers or not, the Cubs are going to have several blown saves if they're asked to protect a 1 run lead most nights. They are playing way too many close games to not have a few trickle away from them. Exactly. Looking for outside help for the bullpen ignores the larger problem of improving the offense. More close games = games blown by the bullpen.
  7. What's the timeline of those blown saves?
  8. Hah! Bob: "One of the STUPIDEST pitches I've ever seen a team throw."
  9. No offense to Olemisscub who posted the article, but what a load of crap. Totally disregarding the fact that at least one of the scant examples used by the author would hardly be considered performance enhancing ( I don't think many would champion being drunk as a performance enhancer), the author goes on to name a few players who " once took an amphetamine", or were using pain medication for an injury, in a span covering 100+ years, and tries to compare it to over 100 people who were proven to have used performance and body altering drugs in a single season. Not at all convincing in my opinion. He could have at least brought up Dock Ellis pitching while tripping on LSD or something. It's not a direct comparison. The piece is pointing out how the cheating "line" is still so blurry. Even if you're going to declare modern steroids and PED's to be the end-all-be-all, then where on the scale does cheating become OK?
  10. Do you disagree? I do. All sorts of players have bent rules, including taking illegal substances, to gain an edge, throughout history and many of them are in the HOF. Yes, but not all of them were caught. It is different in a case like Sosa's where reportedly there is proof that he was cheating by taking illegal substances. Proof he was using in 2003. Now, I'm not realistically saying that it was likely he wasn't using when he was at his peak, but when you look at it rationally, why does getting caught for something in one season automatically negate your numbers from other seasons?
  11. I'd like for Soriano to be the DH guy the next 6 games. You gotta let him try and hit his way out of this, plus it hopefully helps him ease up on his knee a bit.
  12. It would definitely be a surprise since it's not even remotely close to being true.
  13. If Gameday said it was a bad pitch then Gameday was off. He painted the outside corner perfectly against a rookie up in that situation. why does it matter if it's a rookie? if it's a strike it's a strike. It matters in how the pitcher is going to approach the batter. I wasn't bringing up Fox being a rookie in terms of the call. I was bringing it up in terms of it being a perfect pitch to lock up a rookie hitter in an 0-2 count.
  14. If Gameday said it was a bad pitch then Gameday was off. He painted the outside corner perfectly against a rookie up in that situation.
  15. Poor Blanco. Seems like he gets most of the huge AB's these days.
  16. This guy is seemingly trying to dish fast balls down the middle as much as possible so I can see why Kosuke went after the first pitch like he did.
  17. I can understand being glad to see him on the bench due to a really prolonged slump as he's been in for some time, but to be happy in general for him to be on the bench simply because one "doesn't like him" is nuts.
  18. If we offer Seasn Marshall, were giving up too much. If we offer Kevin Hart or Mitch Atkins, its not enough. So wheres the in between? Hart or Atkins+ a few lower pitching prospects? That doesnt sound unreasonable. Then maybe trading for DeRosa isn't the best option. Crazy, I know.
×
×
  • Create New...