Jump to content
North Side Baseball

Sammy Sofa

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    98,222
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    208

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Chicago Cubs Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by Sammy Sofa

  1. I'd prefer "Aaron Miles - The Final Solution." I can't believe he made me long for the days of Neifi.
  2. I didn't mind him when he first showed up simply because he wasn't Harry, who I really couldn't stand at all for about the last decade he was on the mic. Once Len took over, however, it was like a light bulb clicked on with the idea of, "ohhhh, so THIS is a how a good announcer sounds."
  3. It can't even be considered? Man, that's strict. It's not like anyone is actually saying, "don't fire Hendry because the next guy would be worse." There's a huge difference between that and "go ahead and fire Hendry...but I'm not getting my hopes up that the next guy will be any better."
  4. Yes and no. Given the new owners I can see the appeal of getting someone new in and signaling a "new era," but that typically requires paying big for such "newness." If the money is there, great, get the new guy in. If not, eh, limit Hendry basically to trades only and I can live with it for another year. Either way, I'm not losing sleep. If they want to still fire Hendry and there's not the money to make a big splash I'm not going to be worked up over it. I guess technically I could live with it for another year, but there's no good reason why we should have to. He's been in charge for a very long time and the team is barely over .500 with a huge financial advantage over the competition. I'm not all that upset that Joshua has been canned, but it's a weak move by Jim who typically finds something else to blame for a lack of success. He goes year to year on bizarre tangents, and he's the one who put them in this tight spot with so much money tied into just a few guys for several years. So if they somehow make it so his moves can't cripple the team going further, fine. But much like "Dusty-proofing" a roster, I don't see the point in hanging onto a guy you have to prevent from screwing up the team when he does what he wants to do. I agree with all of this.
  5. Yes and no. Given the new owners I can see the appeal of getting someone new in and signaling a "new era," but that typically requires paying big for such "newness." If the money is there, great, get the new guy in. If not, eh, limit Hendry basically to trades only and I can live with it for another year. Either way, I'm not losing sleep. If they want to still fire Hendry and there's not the money to make a big splash I'm not going to be worked up over it.
  6. No, it doesn't. I'm not opposed at all to firing Hendry; I just recognize the odds that his replacement will be better aren't very good. That doesn't mean I want Hendry to stick around...I'm just not getting worked up over his replacement until they prove they're not part of the usual parade of crap that is the average MLB GM. When was the last time an owner telegraphed a GM replacement before first firing the existing one? The Jocketty situation is the only one I can remember. I don't understand what this has to do with anything. I'm not stating that the replacement has to be picked out or "telegraphed" or interviewed or whatever before Hendry is fired. I don't care if, how, where or when Hendry is fired. The closest I've come to "defending" him is saying that I wouldn't be opposed to keeping him for another season only if there is no significant payroll to work with and even then I'm not against him being fired.
  7. No, it doesn't. I'm not opposed at all to firing Hendry; I just recognize the odds that his replacement will be better aren't very good. That doesn't mean I want Hendry to stick around...I'm just not getting worked up over his replacement until they prove they're not part of the usual parade of crap that is the average MLB GM.
  8. Yesssssssssss. Don't let that stop you, dexter. FIGHTFIGHTFIGHTFIGHTFIGHT
  9. Nice air.
  10. How many times has Gruden had to change after soaking himself in a torrent of his own [expletive] tonight?
  11. Jesus Christ, Gruden, put your [expletive] away.
  12. What did they have to montage? I don't know they had one for 2006, and I can't remember one memorable moment after April of that year except sweeping the Cardinals in a 4 game series in July. They've had one every year at least since 2003.
  13. You're right.....when the baseball historians look back on the 08 season the first thing out of their mouths will be "Remember that Cub team that won 97 games?"....... Is the bar seriously that low? So a season is only worthwhile if it's remembered by "baseball historians?"
  14. Yeah, because it's all been on Forte and nothing to do with the terrible o-line. I think Barry Sanders would struggle to gain yards with this O-line. He would, but it seems like Forte's lost a bit this season. We'll see how he looks as the season goes on. Really? He looks fine to me when there's room. Exactly. I don't see anything wrong with him when there's actually some blocking.
  15. Yeah, because it's all been on Forte and nothing to do with the terrible o-line.
  16. FORRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR-TAY.
  17. Looks like he was stepped on.
  18. It is because it isn't on WGN Nope.... wrong again. CUBS are 29-33 when WGN broadcasts the game CUBS are 40-28 when CSN broadcasts the game Kudos.
×
×
  • Create New...