Jump to content
North Side Baseball

Sammy Sofa

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    98,227
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    208

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Chicago Cubs Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by Sammy Sofa

  1. Wasn't just his scouts. Maybe I'm not remembering right, but weren't there a lot of scouting reports, not just from the Cubs, out there comparing him to Matsui? The general consensus seemed to be some kind of wonderful middle ground between Matsui and Ichiro.
  2. Umadbro???? I'm not content with merely making it to the playoffs and losing in a horrible fashion. And I really don't understand how any fan can be happy with our personal moves. With that said why do you have a problem with me giving credit and respect to the pats while also being sarcastic at the same time? No, I'm not mad. You're probably too blinded by yet another spittle-flecked, vein-busting tantrum to realize that.
  3. Wasn't just his scouts.
  4. how often in baseball does one team sign two of the top 3 free agents? Granted I know we have the money but it just doesnt seem to happen to anyone other than the yankees and redsox. And it might not happen here. But the Cubs certainly have the means to do so and the glaring need to do so.
  5. Dude's been nothing but a raging spaz his entire time posting here. Hopefully he lives up to his word and starts following other teams.
  6. Signing guys like Wilson and Prince/Pujols isn't just "a couple of tweaks."
  7. No worries they're a contender next year Take a bow.
  8. How does that even compare? Don't be an idiot.
  9. Meh. That's a pretty dumb article when you've got the writer basing it around the idea that he thinks signing Kosuke was Hendry's biggest mistake. Kosuke was a very sought after player and if the reports are true he actually took LESS money than what was being offered out there to come to the Cubs, so it's not like a a Soriano situation where Hendry pushed his way to head of the pack by offering an insane amount of years and money. Plus Swisher wasn't very good in 2008. That's not to say things wouldn't have been different if he had joined the Cubs, but you also have to wonder how much of his success since then has been the result of being able to be in that Yankees lineup.
  10. you realize that other people can read your posts, right? Yes I realize that and I highly doubt anyone on here would disagree with the above statement or sentiment. We can barely manage the TE position, let alone the entire roster. EDIT: None of the 2007 draft picks made by Chicago remain on the roster. Nah, most of the people here aren't football whoooo-ahs.
  11. Glad you've come to your senses.
  12. True, but that's not what I'm saying. I'm saying having a decent OFer to fill-in for Sizemore and Choo while they are on the DL is more valuable than money to the Indians. How much can the Indians up their payroll? They may have been trying to keep from adding much payroll either because they're right against their cap or they plan on pursuing another player(s) who will cost money. Right. Kosuke is a role player move, not an impact player. That team doesn't spend a lot and very well could be crunching the numbers in anticipation of an actual impact move before the deadline.
  13. Makes sense. The Cubs' system looked a LOT worse 2 years ago, Soriano would have been even more expensive, and the best players that the Cubs had (outside of Soto) were pretty expensive themselves.
  14. Because Kosuke Fukudome isn't the kind of player you can force a last minute deal for.
  15. I would assume the Cubs wanted some kind of player return and that's the best that was made available to them of what they wanted.
  16. I'm having trouble following your logic. Given that these guys are in the Indian's minor league system and aren't any great shakes I can't imagine they're making all that much. Why would the Indians, a team with limited financial resources, take on more of Fukudome's contract instead of giving up a pair of likely inconsequential prospects who almost certainly aren't costing 500k, much less a million dollars? Money is more valuable to the Indians than these guys.
  17. Don't really follow the logic here. I'm wanting the Cubs to give less money to the Indians in return for taking no minor leaguers in the trade. Instead of getting organizational filler and covering 4 million of his contract. Take no players back and pay less of Kosuke's remaining salary. That way the Cubs would have more money to spend on their draft picks. How much are these players making?
  18. Maybe. I mean, I like Kosuke, but he is what he is at this point and the Cubs simply were not in a good position to get much back for him.
  19. I guess it can't rebound then. If he's this bad, why are the Indians trading for him when they have so much at stake this season? I guess their scouts are idiots. But if they want him, they want him. It doesn't mean the Cubs have to take these guys in return? Just cover less of the salary. Because maybe the money saved her is going to signing their draft picks from their very good draft this year. Really would rather go with that than picking up the tab for Kosuke so they can get a marginal increase in the return they're getting from the Indians. And the Indians probably want him because he's cheap in this deal and because there's the chance his OBP could rebound. I'm just pointed out the trend that would indicate why the Cubs weren't going to get a very good return for him. You're simply overvaluing him.
  20. His defense isn't very good. Look up his metrics. It's serviceable, but in no way are we talking about some kind of defensive whiz. Fukudome's OBP month by month this year: .486 .389 .315 .329
  21. So then I will ask you, too; why do you think a team would give up a younger player? I guarantee you the only way they'd have a chance of that is if they took no money back. And it would probably have been only that one prospect. And even then it probably wouldn't have been offered. Fukudome has minimal value right now.
  22. Yes, all, of his stats this year have somehow come against the Cubs. It's really rather amazing.
  23. I still don't understand why you're so convinced the Cubs could have gotten younger prospects if they wanted to. It's not like they had much leverage. "Oh, so you won't give us a better return for our expensive, declining, old corner OF who hits for almost no power and doesn't really play very good defense anymore? WELL, TOO BAD."
×
×
  • Create New...