Jump to content
North Side Baseball

Sammy Sofa

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    98,227
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    208

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Chicago Cubs Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by Sammy Sofa

  1. Good.
  2. I really think this is Kaplan. You can smell the enraged flopsweat through the message board.
  3. YOU LOOK LIKE A DONG.
  4. Holy [expletive]. PLEASE BE KAPLAN.
  5. And hey, look, we've found Kaplan's one fan.
  6. I have seen the term thrown around by a select few on this board with regards to Cubs fans in general. Pretty broad brush to paint with, no? And this has nothing to do with Kaplan. And if Kaplan was a racist like some on this board toe the line on, what the hell is he posing with a (gulp) Pujols jersey for? Because he's not some overt Klan member; he just lets the inherent racism of our society color his opinions of players he doesn't like. He despised Todd Hundley. Of course, he was hispanic, so you might be on to something. I'll make this as clear as I can: Kaplan's "racism" stems from his repeated fallback to stereotypical criticisms of non-white players (lazy, doesn't care, gives up, etc.).
  7. Again, we're talking about a decade here. The "waiting/assuming something would be/had been done" line of thought doesn't fly at all.
  8. I have seen the term thrown around by a select few on this board with regards to Cubs fans in general. Pretty broad brush to paint with, no? And this has nothing to do with Kaplan. And if Kaplan was a racist like some on this board toe the line on, what the hell is he posing with a (gulp) Pujols jersey for? Because he's not some overt Klan member; he just lets the inherent racism of our society color his opinions of players he doesn't like.
  9. It's not a "bad contract" for the duration of the contract, hence the advantage when a team can take the hit of the last couple of years after reaping the benefits of the good years.
  10. Either player is going to get the biggest contract in Cubs history. It'd be the biggest "bet" the team has ever made. And? Any big contract is a gamble.
  11. Why do you care if anyone calls Kaplan a racist?
  12. Slave-owners loved [expletive] their slaves.
  13. Who is talking about "betting their chips" on either player? They'd be a part of going forward, not what the team is hinging their future on. Or are you just talking about "betting" whether either will be productive enough to justify signing them?
  14. Nobody tell dave the things that made the Red Sox clubhouse so harmonious during Theo's tenure there.
  15. I guess, though high profile kidnappings are hardly rare.
  16. Kidnappings in Central and South America? Holy [expletive], yes.
  17. The only that makes sense to me is if he was completely oblivious to what was going on. At the very least he knew something "improper" occurred between Sandusky and a young boy on campus, so just that Sandusky was able to return to the campus again and again shows, to me, that his intentions were nowhere near doing the right thing. Unless you're arguing that he basically completely in the dark outside of that one occurrence it rings ridiculously hollow to try and play the "well, we don't know his intentions" card. At the very least his intentions were to continue to allow a known child abuser to use the program and the campus to facilitate interaction with young men and boys. Unless, of course, Sandusky only showed up when Joe wasn't around and everyone was nice enough to not tell him about it.
  18. We sure as [expletive] can figure out what his intentions weren't. But who cares? Regardless of his intentions, the results were the same. Uh, I "care" because his disinterest in preventing his football program being used as a staging ground for child rape seems pretty monstrous.
  19. We sure as [expletive] can figure out what his intentions weren't.
  20. http://www.thesportslion.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/carlos-zambrano-cubs.jpg "THEY DREW FIRST BLOODS!!!!"
  21. I have little doubt they'll spend money when they need/want to. I really don't think Theo, Hoyer and McLeod would have all come here if part of the plan was to effectively cap the Cubs payroll as it stands or barely increase it.
  22. His intentions over the last decade+ have apparently been something other than stopping his former coach from using the school as part of his rape-spree.
  23. You really don't think the Cubs can or will be able to swing a $150+ million payroll? Or one around $170 million? Why not? I don't know what the Ricketts family's plans are, but $170 million is a pretty large jump from what it is now, especially if they want to spend a lot in the draft. They're a family with a ton of money with a major market team that makes a ton of money. I don't think the payroll increasing between $30-$60 million is all that unlikely.
  24. Alright, he just shot to the top of the list for me.
  25. You really don't think the Cubs can or will be able to swing a $150+ million payroll? Or one around $170 million? Why not?
×
×
  • Create New...