Jump to content
North Side Baseball

Sammy Sofa

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    98,226
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    208

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Chicago Cubs Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by Sammy Sofa

  1. But now we're back to the idea that it was never really fair after it had been around a decade (even accounting for fewer teams).
  2. Dumping deadwood teams and wanting some kind of limitations on spending to maintain a broken system are two very different things. There's simply not an answer to make things "fair" for small market teams that wouldn't suck for the game. Most of them simply should not exist, something you seem to agree with.
  3. Plus he drives like a Chinese!
  4. But, again, until the Celtics a few years ago where are these teams buying rings with money? And it's not like those teams have a clear advantage when it comes to being able to spend money; this isn't a Yankees-type situation. I'm not saying everything is on the same level, but come on, we're not looking at a huge baseball-like disparity. Hell, the Heat can't even fill of their seats. Plus a lot of those decisions simply stem from the desire of players to play for a big market team. How are they supposed to regulate that?
  5. Plus Stern presided over the late 80's to the late 90's era of the NBA, when you arguably had the best, most competitive era in the league's history. Again, even if we argue that things went south after that it's still basically just an argument against the Lakers.
  6. But the Knicks have been really bad for a good chunk of Stern's tenure. They had that 15 years stretch and have been rather unimpressive otherwise. Similar situation with the Bulls, too. Hell, this whole thing could be boiled down to an argument against the Lakers and the Celtics (and even then mostly the former).
  7. It seems like a decent point when it kind of debunks the idea you're presenting that 30 years ago/Stern ushered in some kind of imbalanced era that's unfair to almost everyone except a small group of teams. The NBA has been dominated by a small group of teams since it started. I'm not arguing that the financial landscape hasn't changed, but it seems like you're going about the wrong way of pointing that out by pointing out that only 9 teams have won the title in the last 20 years when only 15 have won it in the last 60.
  8. It wasn't really until the Boston Big 3 and the Heat last season that you saw money truly putting together teams, and even then those teams still hinged on on drafted/homegrown talent.
  9. Pop quiz: Who has made the most worthless comment in the past 1 page? You're not witty. Why did you only go back 30 years? Because a trend started. One that Stern had a lot to with. Wait, what? The trend of a relatively small group of teams winning the title didn't start then. It was arguably there from the very beginning. Again, we've only had 15 different teams win the title since 1950.
  10. See also: Knicks, The New York.
  11. Pop quiz: Who has made the most worthless comment in the past 1 page? You're not witty. Why did you only go back 30 years?
  12. Answer: 11 instead of 9! All the way back to the beginning (1950)? 15 (though 1 of those teams no longer exists at all)!
  13. Pop quiz: how many more teams have won the title if you go back 50 years instead of just 30?
  14. Who cares about New Orleans and Charlotte??? Amirite? Yes, you are rite.
  15. Yeah, but they're the Timberwolves. Who cares what they want?
  16. Isn't it 9? And arguing that it's unfair requires glossing over the details. Take a team like the Pistons; they're one of the 9 because they won in '89 and 90's and then not again until 2005. There are some big gaps in between a lot of those wins. You also have something like 17 different teams making the finals during those 30 years. You've also got 6 different title winners in the last decade.
  17. Laugh all you want, but The Last Boyscout was based on REAL LIFE.
  18. I agree; he could be even more late to the next one. And then....anarchy.
  19. ALSO: BITCHES ALWAYS BE SHOPPIN'.
  20. Glad to see you really put some time and thought into such a well-reasoned and logical conclusion.
  21. So it's between all of the guys they interviewed. Stunning.
  22. NIGHTMARE FUEL: http://i603.photobucket.com/albums/tt112/MrWookie47/1231448056721-1.jpg
  23. Looks like Hendry has a beer. Or could be bacon grease in a glass, since it's Hendry. I don't follow. Because Hendrys fat and fat people like to drink straight bacon grease. Good God man does everything need to be written out? I still don't get it.
  24. Looks like Hendry has a beer. Or could be bacon grease in a glass, since it's Hendry. I don't follow.
×
×
  • Create New...