Ryno was great and boring, and really only had 1 signature moment in Wrigley. But Wood, Prior, Sosa and the bulk of the 60's guys were entertaining enough. The level of meaningful history is certainly not what it should be for a team that has played in the same stadium in a major market that long. But it's hardly non-existent. It's hardly non-existent pretty much in that it just technically exists. I love history and I love baseball, but my favorite team just has a relatively pretty boring history when compared to basically all of the other similarly long-lasting teams. Part of that is how bad they've tended to be for nearly a century at Wrigley, but a big part of it is, as you touched on, is that a lot of these guys are pretty boring (and I'd include most of the 60's greats). Some great players and (mostly) nice guys, but snoozeville otherwise.