i get why we claimed him...harrold is a 7th dman/13th forward and i want to say there were concerns about drewiske at the time, but i can't remember when he got claimed exactly. lombardi didn't want to rush anyone into a crappy role. the only problem with him was his usage. he is a 12 minute a night defender. he got, i'm gonna guess, around 18+ minutes on some nights. i think he was 4th in ice-time in game 1, but i haven't seen the numbers for the other 3 games he played. it's really a shame that davis drewiske got hurt early in the season. he was really solid to start the year and had a nice finish to last year. basically the anti-jones. plays safe, makes smart plays at the blue line in the offensive zone, gets the puck out of trouble. after he got hurt, he never found his groove again though. he looked really shaky every time he was on the ice. if he stays healthy all season, we probably don't have to deal with jones in the playoffs. quick, honestly, was pretty bad after game 1. even in game 2...we could have had that in regulation if he didn't blow the first goal for sure, and i think he could have even played the 2nd goal better. he was very good for about 2/3 of the season, but it seemed obvious to everyone watching that he was just run into the ground. murray overused him badly. i guess i don't blame him, getting into the playoffs was the goal this year. i just don't see why he was so opposed to using ersberg. i can only think of one solid game he had after the olympic break. game 1 was pretty much it. eta: i meant to say, the 'nucks dominated the play throughout the series. at 5 on 5, they beat us so badly. goals were like 20-7 at 5 on 5 or some ridiculous stat like that. we actually outplayed them, finally, in game 6. goaltending did cost us though.