in other words, "i don't really understand the rule well enough to explain my position" I understand the rule--which is why I know it was the correct call.
Why would I want to make an argument for something that is self evidently correct? Just watch the highlights later. If it makes you feel better I totally agree about the blown no-call on grounding.
No, you don't understand the rules. If you did, you would know that was blatant PI. I'm not trying to sound like an ahole but it was in no way questionable. It's not even a matter of interpretation or opinion. It was clear.
defensive player was making a play for ball, so no interference...know the rules I know the rules. In fact, I'd say anyone who doesn't think that was anything but blatant PI has a dubious grasp at best of the rules. It was obvious.
I read something about Kiffin in Knoxville. I think he'd be a good--albeit risky--hire for Tennessee. I didn't even really like him at USC but he'll be a recruiter and he can scheme pretty well. I actually like him more as a head coach after his Raiders stint.
to be fair, he only missed his receiver by 10 yards on that pass. The intimidation factor of SEC DEFENSES and SPEED is so great that unpressured quarterbacks can be excused for over throwing receivers on routine in patterns.
I swear 50% of the reason why the SEC gets such a reputation for good defense is because of wretched quarterback play. How many awful reads and errant throws have their been in this game so far? Wilson and Lee are terrible.