Well, that's what happens when you base your conclusions off a two-game sample size. Boston is a better team than the Bulls. They're not head and shoulders better than the Bulls without Garnet, but they're measurably better. I couldn't be happier about a 1-1 split with the game two loss coming on a last second shot. I would dispute the notion that they are measurably better--marginally better at best. You take the Celtics, sans KG, and project them over an 82 game schedule and you take the Bulls team that is out there now and I'd be hard pressed to say that the Celtics would win more ball games.