Jump to content
North Side Baseball

SpongeWorthy

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    14,776
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Chicago Cubs Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by SpongeWorthy

  1. Unless we had a sign and trade, that's correct. That's a bummer. I'm slightly surprised that we can't unload Hinrich...he's been playing well and seems like he's exactly what the Lakers need plus he's got a declining contract. People are probably hung up on his overall numbers he was probably the worst player in the league the first month of the season.
  2. They must be really concerned about Salmons opting in. I figured that had a small chance of happening. We can't even target ONE max FA if we still have to pay Salmons right?
  3. I wouldn't be stunned if Kentucky made the Final 4 or anything. They're pretty good. Sometimes you don't win every game by 20 points and sometimes you fatten up on a weak schedule and make deep tourney runs. Calipari did it at Memphis and Florida did it in the SEC.
  4. Are we really clearing any more cap room under the rumored terms wrt to TMac? It seems like the deal is to insure that we don't have to pay Salmons next year if he decides to opt in.
  5. I used to sort of hold my nose when people talked about signing David Lee but considering he'll be quite a bit cheaper than Boozer or Amare, you could do a lot worse. I figured he was sort of a glorified energy man who got cheap stats in D'Antoni's system, and he is to an extent, but he's pretty legit--can finish with either hand around the bucket, good midrange jumper, and he's got a few moves and good footwork down low. You do have to hide him on defense because he's is pretty atrocious although the Knicks have such horrible perimeter defenders and such overall team stupidity its hard to tell how bad he really is on D.
  6. My Russian friend is freaking out over the fact that the Russians have only managed to win one, measly bronze medal.
  7. Shannon Brown was a huge disappointment in the dunk contest. To me, he is just like JRich circa 2002 and could've thrown down some sick dunks. Can't believe those guys had such vanilla crap prepared. I think some of them flat out choked and had much better stuff in practice.
  8. Between the SNES game, the commercials, wearing his hat backwards in the Derby, Junior was definitely The Man amongst kids in the 90s. Bonds just didn't resonate nearly as much. Thomas was probably #2 although quite a ways off from Griffey's shine though.
  9. I always felt luge was lacking more giant, steel poles near the finish line. Seriously, whose idea was that?
  10. I don't think there's any reason the Saints wouldn't want him back at a reduced rate. He's a perfect fit there with Sean Payton and Brees and I think he'd probably take less than market value to stay. But if he gets on the market the Bears should definitely inquire.
  11. I wish they showed the part right after where Scottie walks right up to Spike Lee and starts jawing at him. That's a good list of dunks too. The Tom Chambers one is so unbelievable.
  12. Texas? wtf There's no way.
  13. Hah. That figures. Well, I guess if he can be back for the next regular season game I'd say just sit him through the break.
  14. Devin Brown was a starter for the Hornets and averaged 9 points. That's how good Chris Paul is.
  15. Shiancoe is a very good red zone weapon but he won't get more touches than Harvin. Harvin gets touches in all phases of the game and I bet he'll run the ball more next year too. I think he pretty much exceeded any reasonable expectations people had of him. He was pretty damn polished for the pro game coming out of that Florida offense. The reason I'll say that I would trade any two Bears receivers for him is because I don't think Bennett and Devin A. are guys that can't be replaced easily. They would be 4th and 5th receivers on the Vikings, at best. Knox is a talent but I would give him and Hester up for Harvin as well. He still needs a ton of work...right now he just runs by guys. Harvin is a potential top 10-15 offensive weapon in the entire league, IMO and offers a ton of versatility. Hester has never been an effective receiver and return guy in the same season and Harvin did it his rookie year.
  16. Harvin was the #1 player in high school, one of the best players in college, and was effective as a #2 receiver, wildcat runner, and a returner. He's very, very good. I admit I'm high on him but I think he's a perennial pro bowl caliber guy. He came out of a very un-pro style offense and was a big weapon his first year as a pro when many rookie WRs don't do much of anything. He does have a tendency to get hurt though. If he can stay healthy he'll be right there with Desean Jackson next year.
  17. No, it's because you think the Bears receivers are acceptably good. They're not. Maybe all we can do is hope they can be in the future but they're not at the moment. If you called up the Vikings and offered Devin Hester and Johnny Knox (or Bennett or Devin A.) for Harvin they'd laugh in your face.
  18. Hakim put up those numbers as the 4th cog in one of the best offenses in NFL history. Hester might be better but if he's putting up numbers like that and maybe doing damage in the return game as the 3rd or 4th guy for us I would be happy. That's assuming we've got a strong 1-3.
  19. Then the blame lies with the Bears and you. He isn't a number 1, never should have been marketed as a #1 and should not be expected to be a #1 by anybody. Except he is the Chicago Bears #1. It'd be like saying if the Cubs had Randy Wells as their #1 starter then it's probably safe to say their starting pitching sucks ass. It's not necessarily casting aspersions on Wells but it's a solid indicator.
  20. I would trade any two receivers on the Bears for Percy Harvin and not think twice about it.
  21. FO is certainly better than just looking at the counting stats gotten from the box score. And I'm not saying Hester doesn't have value...but the fact that he is our best receiver is troubling and indication that the situation needs to be fixed one way or another. If he was a our #2 or a slot guy with good return skills then I'd be perfectly happy with him.
  22. Um, I'm saying I find the claim that there are more unnecessary, cheap, and illegal hits today dubious and that the increase in concussions and their negative consequences has more to do with better diagnosis and a far better medical understanding of their long term implications.
  23. Well like I said, I'm skeptical that there are really more violent, dangerous, and unnecessary styles of tackles being done these days. People are seeing more portions of more games than ever before today. Every violent hit is diagnosed to death and put under the spotlight. So while that may encourage guys to go for the highlight tackle to end up on SportsCenter it's entirely possible that we just think there's more violent hits because we're able to see more of them because of the confluence of media and technology. YouTube Jack Tatum and tell me that guy wasn't clotheslining people or leading with the helmet in ways that would get him automatically suspended nowadays. Mark Carrier did some freaking brutal helmet to helmet shots when he was a Bear (I believe he earned a suspension or two in his day).
  24. http://www.footballoutsiders.com/stats/wr Hester is the highest ranked Bears WR at 47th. That's a gigantic problem. Basically any passing attack who you would hope the Bears emulate has two or even three guys rated higher than any Bears receiver. If you drop back and pass enough, which the Bears did a lot, even crappy receivers are going to accumulate stats, especially with a talented QB. It's practically a mathematical certainty. Remember when McNabb was screwing around with garbage like Todd Pinkston, James Thrash, and Fredex? They put up some numbers too. But their passing attack got a lot better when they had good TO for a year and then picked up Jackson and Maclin. Same with Brady when he went from Deion Branch and Troy Brown to Moss and Welker.
  25. Saying concussions are surely coming from a lack of proper tackling form is the sort of specious logic nutbags use to say vaccinations are causing autism in children. Our scientific understanding of the brain is in is infancy but it's worlds better than what it was just 10 years ago. I mean how often were concussions being quickly diagnosed on the sidelines in the 60s? Or the days of leather helmets? We're seeing more concussions because we can diagnose them better and it's considered more of a problem because we understand the linkages between brain injuries and dementia, Parkinsons, etc. Also the players are just bigger and faster: F = ma and all that.
×
×
  • Create New...