I dunno I guess I'd just prefer a defensive oriented guard at the 2 with the starting lineup we have. We already have supposedly below average defenders in Rose and Boozer in the lineup, and as awesome as Noah is he struggles in certain situations against bigger matchups. Adding a 3rd bad defender could really cause the starting lineup to struggle. I mean I guess he would be ok. He only shot 33% from 3 last year though, and 6 attempts per game. Is that even beneficial? I am asking seriously because I didn't think 33% was all that good. I don't prefer a defensive oriented SG. I would like a guy that can shoot the 3 like JR, but can also at least serviceable on defense. Since Smith can't play D at all, I would like to keep Brewer around and play the matchups. Sometimes you use JR for offense, sometimes you use Brewer for D. Sometimes you use both when Deng disappears. I will say though, that the 33% last year (closer to 34% actually) was an anomaly for JR. He's 37% for his career, and if you include this year so far he's had 4 of his last 5 years over 39%, which is wonderful. My problem is JR doesn't have an off button. You're as likely to get a 1-8 from 3 from him as you are a 5 for 7. He shot 40% in 08-09, yet he still had 15 games where he shot under 35% with at least 6 shots. In 2 playoff losses to the Lakers that year he went a combined 3-20 from 3. Yeah, he has his flaws. That's why you're looking at a rumored swap centered around Brewer/Bogans types. The defense would suffer but you're still putting Deng on the best offensive wing player anyway. I do think Rose would be able to generate cleaner looks for Smith than Billups does. Billups doesn't collapse defenses like Rose does and while Melo can, he's not a PG. Imagine all the WIDE open corner 3s going from Bogans to Smith.