But Bryant was an 18th rounder at that stage of his career, so how the [expletive] are they very comparable? No. He was a 1st rounder that fell strictly due to an extremely strong commitment. Toronto offered him 3 mill and he still went to school. Was going to say that even if he was an overslot, it's not like he was gonna be a top 5 pick or something... If so, that's craziness. Guess it worked out. Even then, there was no real sequence for when you took high end talent. Maples was a 1st round talent we drafted in the 14th. Dunston was a top 100ish type we got late(11th maybe?) It would have needed to be like the Pirates did with Josh Bell. He was very adamant about going to school, but Pittsburgh took him early(2nd maybe?) and threw 5 mill at him. Which he took obviously. I'm not thinking Bryant was a top 5 guy or anything, but he was definitely a 1st rounder. And in some cases, it's possible his stock dropped a bit due to less interest, with him almost definitely headed to college.