Yeah, I don't think he was the best. That's the point. He was targeted a lot and put up decent numbers, but in a very inefficient manner. Inefficient? He had the most yards per target on the entire team...by a decent margin. How is that not a measure of efficiency? I realize he caught a lesser % of balls thrown his way but he made up for it in YAC and YPC. I know its not the only thing, but Tell me which Bears receiver was better last year. Bennett, who didnt even see the field much the first 60% of the season? Hester, who is probably as raw or more as a receiver as Knox? Aromashadou? Not that this adds anything to my argument because you are obviously smart enough to evaluate the numbers I posted before, but this is what their stats would look like if they all had 99 targets CAT YRD TD
Knox 51 960 5
Bennett 65 792 5
Olsen 59 580 7
Hester 54 644 5 I just don't see it. Knox stands out as king of the idiots. All of these stats are pretty misleading, imo. When compared to other WRs on the Bears, Knox may have run a lot more "feast-or-famine" go routes that went for a lot of yards when a completion was made. That doesn't necessarily make him a better receiver. I'm not sold.