Except, sadly, Dempster, the one guy who really ought to be a ROOGY. Dempster in 2007: vs. LH: 1.23 ERA, 11 K, 5 BB, 1.09 WHIP in 7.1 IP vs. RH: 3.38 ERA, 8 K, 1 BB, 0.66 WHIP in 10.2 IP ROOGY? I think not. I could break out the sample size argument, but I hardly need to - that line against righties looks better, other than the Ks (ERA against lefties? How does that work? The only way I can think of is entirely meaningless). In any case, his three year splits against lefties: .286/.394/.401. Anybody who allows an OBP of nearly .400 is not getting the job done.