yeah so i'm not sure if you've noticed by now but warp is kind of a joke. that aside, you're viewing these as a cumulative 40 prospects graded with no rankings. you're mistaken in their intent. their intent is to rank the players by best to worst of the top 40 prospects, and there is just far too many previous errors to indicate they have a good handle on what they're doing. flaws in your method aside, this point best highlights the juxtaposition between the two. looking at the lists in hindsight, it is apparent that BA does a better job of sniffing out the star players which is highly due to the superior scouting input with which they affiliate. given that they tend to gravitate towards the more high upside star caliber players rather than the average regular types the results regarding cumulative warp would also be distorted by the quantity over quality approach the latter employs. if you like their rankings, i'm glad for you. i've never been impressed with them, but i'm sure they're happy to have your monthly $5.