Eeeeeeh. I get it from the position that the system doesn't have any obvious stars and we're shy on pitchers so load up favored young bats. Beyond that I don't see how like an .8andchange OPS hitting in the high .260s to low .270s so far during round 2 at the level constitutes like a profile changing kind of jump in performance. He's getting much more contact in the air but that's more course correcting, he had to do that. I'm not sure it's any more impressive than Gallardo's big leap in pulled contact, Ks, K-BBs, otw to HR/FB% etc during his own round 2 as a similar ARL case in the system. Heck, I'd even say it's not *more* impressive as Hearn going from a 67 wRC+ to 91 with improved periphs entering tonight. I'd even go as far as offering this take that will surely go over well: Nothing Made's done during round 2 so far at MB is more impressive than Howard going from 30% Ks in MB/A to 20% Ks in SB/A+ over the sample size he got in. Don't get me wrong - better prospect than last year in pretty much every way, but still see more Orlando Cabrera than Carlos Guillen or another offensive minded starting SS (so far!) Before/If we talk about walk rate and Iso...sample size! I'm much much much much more likely to buy the ~.130 IsoSLG, singledigit% HR/FB, ~7.5% BBs over 440 PAs at the level than the ~.180 and double digits he'll walk out with (so far for 2022) tn ---- Also I will insist Ethan Hearn get some love on midseason lists, solidly outside the top 10 but in top 30s for sure. It's ugly but he's productive, made big leaps, is still very young given the position and timeline (drafted 2019 out of HS as a top ranked player in his demo, pandemic 2020), and toolsy healthy LHH catchers with some defensive chops including arm strength and any sign of an offensive approach will get infinite opportunities in pro ball I tend to think that having an .8andchange OPS that isn't heavily average driven is a good thing. The knock on him was pitch recognition/walk rate. He has made an unbelievable leap in that regard. I will concede that I give a lot of weight to performance over pedigree/tools, but then we all missed on Trout and Pujols and 1000 others so there's clearly a lot of room for error in subjective analysis.