The only thing ridiculous about this is that you seem to think working irregular innings once a week or so out of the pen is going to somehow help Angel Guzman's development. He should be starting. If he's not starting here, he should be starting at AAA when it becomes apparent to everyone that Miller or Marquis shouldn't be starting. So you find no value in letting him adjust to major league pitching and seeing what he can do against them in the regular season before throwing him into the starting rotation? Or is it just that you want Miller out of here? If we are as much of a good ballclub that we can afford to send Miller packing on a whim, then we should also be a good enough ballclub to adjust for him being gone. When Guzman struggles, you send him down to AAA, then you have to call someone else up because Miller is gone (he's already hinted strongly and Hendry has almost said that he won't go into the pen). Then when they struggle you send them down and bring up someone else.... cont. cont. cont. Let the kid pitch for a little bit and adjust. He's much more likely to stick. Guzman might be very good, but he can also use some more MLB experience without the pressure yet. I find no value in wasting his ability in the bullpen for 2 inning a week, whilst Miller struggles to keep us in ballgames. You also keep throwing out that scenario of Guzman struggling and the subsequent revolving door, yet it's just as likely he'll be an acceptable starting pitcher. Finally, I don't care about what Wade Miller wants. Jim Hendry shouldn't, either. We have nothing invested in him worth caring about. If he's going to throw low velocity with no movement, he should be released. Again, that's the whole point of building depth.