Jump to content
North Side Baseball

USSoccer

Old-Timey Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    17,655

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by USSoccer

  1. USSoccer
    What's with Marshall today?
  2. USSoccer
    I really wish they'd stop the Hester on offense thing
  3. USSoccer
    Lord, if they got in, I'd strongly prefer playing in Green Bay over playing in CLink. They'd get curbstomped in Seattle. In Green Bay, you'd have a punchers chance.
  4. USSoccer
    Yea. I think we need SF to win tonight for that game to matter to GB, IIRC. Everyone realizes that Packers/Vikings is just as big of a rivalry (if not bigger) than Packers/Bears, right? The game will still matter, Christian Ponder is still their QB, and GB will still probably win. Yea, strength of "rivalry" is not something I really take into account. You gotta throw out things like "records," "stats," and tangible things when rivalries are in play......... Yeah, because that's what I said, isn't it?
  5. USSoccer
    Everyone realizes that Packers/Vikings is just as big of a rivalry (if not bigger) than Packers/Bears, right? The game will still matter, Christian Ponder is still their QB, and GB will still probably win. Yea, strength of "rivalry" is not something I really take into account. Firstly, we need Seattle to win for this game to mean something to Green Bay. Next, if that happens, that "rivalry" (which typically I don't buy into but those two teams and fanbases truly, truly hate each other) will simply amp up the meaning for both teams. And in that sort of game, I'll take midget Rodgers and Green Bay over fricking Christian Ponder, even if it is in that dome.
  6. USSoccer
    Seattle
  7. USSoccer
    Seattle isn't going to lose up there.
  8. USSoccer
    Yea. I think we need SF to win tonight for that game to matter to GB, IIRC. Everyone realizes that Packers/Vikings is just as big of a rivalry (if not bigger) than Packers/Bears, right? The game will still matter, Christian Ponder is still their QB, and GB will still probably win.
  9. USSoccer
    Is Cutler drunk?
  10. USSoccer
    Marshall also has to catch that. Also, that was more OPI than any of Alshon's last week.
  11. USSoccer
    Marshall has to catch that.
  12. USSoccer
    Jesus, shoot Hester into the sun via rocket already.
  13. USSoccer
    Nice. Finally a bit of luck.
  14. USSoccer
    That's such a borderline call. We've had terrible luck the past few weeks.
  15. USSoccer
    Dammit Catler.
  16. USSoccer
    Unreal. Nice defense, New Orleans. Well played.
  17. USSoccer
    That wouldn't have made a difference now. If New Orleans holds on, they will have given the Bears 1/3 of what they needed. They need Baltimore and Joe Flacco not to suck again, though, as well. It will come down to Green Bay, or Seattle blowing two games in their fortress.
  18. USSoccer
    I don't know how disinterested Green Bay will be. Rivalry game, playing for a seed, potentially knocking said rival out of the playoffs...
  19. USSoccer
    Anytime Houston wants to stop playing stupid, that would be great.
  20. USSoccer
    Jesus, Villa is garbage.
  21. USSoccer
    I was tossing it in there because of the earlier assertions that Swisher would fit perfectly or that Jackson would make it all better. Except that nobody said Jackson would make it all better.
  22. USSoccer
    Irrationally, I've never cared for DeJesus. But you're probably right.
  23. USSoccer
    I know you get all worked up and all, and I won't disagree with you saying he shouldn't be counted on to start and I'm not saying he's very good offensively, but his defense has always been one of his strong suits. It's ok to admit that he sucks offensively but he's good defensively.
  24. USSoccer
    Jackson? As in Brett? If you are worried about OF defense, yeah. He's a very good defensive CF. But again, this is hypothetical, since I'm not sure signing Swisher would be a great idea.
  25. USSoccer
    Perfect? As what, a RF? RF, middle of the order power bat, sub for Rizzo at 1B, great OBP. That's going to leave a really sketchy OF defense. Our OF isn't exactly cavernous, though. Not that I'm necessarily advocating for Swisher, but couldn't you get away with him in RF and Jackson in CF?
×
×
  • Create New...