No I don't. I just wanted to see what Nathan thought of the two based only on their play. my opinion 75% no baseball 25 % both sports. goes down if he is a 1st rounder. I cant see any NFL team letting him pitch for fun and miss all those play-learning chemistry building summer camps... and from my understanding the deal reported by ESPN et al never happened. he signed a straight milb deal and got 250K bonus. as for comparison, i obviously have a small sample on Jeff but he had primarily an above average fastball (93-95) a non-existant change and an average breaking ball. He didnt throw strikes early in the game and got hurt there. Taylor is the opposite. Fastball is average (89-91), Breaking ball and change up are very good. He just needs to learn how to PITCH. Needs to learn its ok to waste an 0-2 pitch, make them chase. He is a contact picher, not like Veal. He walks very very few and i believe he has hit 1 this year. Complete control pitcher. Good strong body (much like Gallagher on body type, strong legs). I really like watching Scott and Mitch Atkins pitch. Both are young ST = 19, MA = 20. I still say that Atkins is the top prospect pitcher we had this year although Veal might be better now, give the 1 year age difference and Veal's tendency to be a bit wild, Atkins is more consistent but not as flashy. I think all three have very high ceilings and would have all three behind Gallagher, but above any of the others at Peoria or Daytona...