Our bullpen wasn't a strength last year either. It was very mediocre. If anyone with stats can prove my next statements wrong then so do it, but there were a lot of young starters who would only go 4-5-6 max innings (and then maddux) so you'd get into the "long relief" group of Novoa and friends quite often. I think if the starting rotation is built correctly, the numbers will put the bullpen in good light. But that just reinforces the point that starting pitchers are more important than relievers. A strong bullpen is not going to win you many games. You need a strong team. It's great if you can afford to add arms to the bullpen, but bullpen arms are not stable, and strong bullpens often come out of nowhere to become strong. So trading the bullpen to improve the rest of the team could be a good idea if improvement in other places is less replacable, no?