Jump to content
North Side Baseball

craig

Old-Timey Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    4,215

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Chicago Cubs Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by craig

  1. craig
    Man has Arias been hot. On his pitch count, sequencing 3-straight 5-inning games is impressive. He threw a lot of strikes tonight.
  2. craig
    That report has his velocity at only 90-92, and thats in his best game in 13 months. Is that where his velocity is always at? Or is it perhaps even softer when he's not feeling quite as great? Or does he often overthrow to get more velo, so maybe he's cutting back to something softer that maybe he can locate a little better? Am I misremembering? I thought two years ago when he was breaking out, that his fastball was considered excellent, and he was 93-95 then, plus with youth projection to perhaps get faster? Certainly when he was drafted, the scouting reports then weren't "projects to become a soft-toss 90-92 guy if things develop well." Hard to make it in the majors as both a soft-toss and command-challenged guy.
  3. craig
    Dom Hambley went 4 innings without a walk. Nice outing for a wildman.
  4. craig
    Those were some encouraging comments by the scout. " probably the cleanest arm and delivery I had seen all year." I love that, both for health/durability and also for control and repeatability. "He has a four-seam he can bully guys with. It has velo and life and rode up in the strike zone. It was a plus pitch,". I love that too. I've seen velocity reports, but In a world where every RHP throws at least mid-90's, I've wondered whether his fastball was above average, or had asset spin or movement. So nice to see a favorable eval. "So that’s three potential plus pitches in his arsenal." At draft there was talk of two-pitch guy, maybe ends up in relief. The scout touched on both change and curve; not sure which of those he was viewing as the 3rd potential plus pitch? I assume the curve?
  5. craig
    Wrong thread, but yesterday I'd asked for thoughts on Aliendo's defense. Cubs in NY wasn't especially positive, and foresaw him as kind of an organizational guy and fringe-major leaguer. (Quote below). I recall in past Tom with a comment that he's too small. Curiously enough, BA and Callis have somewhat more enthusiastic perspective on his defense. I don't think they spend a lot of time on kinda obscure prospects like Aliendo, though, so grain-of-salt etc.. Just kinda interesting how different sources can perceive guys somewhat differently. Baseball America on Aliendo defense: Jim Callis/Pipeline on Aliendo defense:
  6. craig
    Iowa game is weird. Tie game, bottom of the 10th, bases loaded with only one out. Perhaps one pitch from the game being done, but it's delayed by rain.
  7. craig
    Thanks for your observations, NY. I really appreciate that a lot. Bummer, because I'd had the sense as you mentioned, that he's popular and has good personality qualities that the Cubs seem to prioritize. So I'd hoped that if pitchers love him, and if he proves to be a good hitter, that being kinda average in terms of catch-and-throw and actually catching/receiving might be enough to allow for a successful career. Sorry to hear that the actual physical aspects of catching are sub-par. Disappointing news, but your observations are helpful.
  8. craig
    Scouting question: Aliendo is 7/37 in CS/SB, ~16%. I don't know how to find the league SB-success rate, but just going through the individual teams, there are a couple of exceptions but most teams have SB-success in the 79%-83% range. So, Aliendo is a couple of % below league-norm in throwing guys out. Scouting-wise, does he look clunky/slow on his pop-times? Does his arm-strength look sub-par, or his accuracy? How about as a receiver, does he look clunky and like a guy who will unnecessarily allow an unusual amounts of passed balls and wild pitches? I'm just kinda wondering whether his catch-and-throw capacity is a problem, and whether his receiving capacity is a problem, in terms of his prospect-hood? Or if he's pretty much just fine; maybe some of the tall wildmen pitchers don't give him a chance? Or maybe his receiving is excellent, and he's great with all the soft stuff; so even if his arm is unexceptional it's not at all a show-stopper for becoming a good big-league catcher?
  9. craig
    Frankling lifted after 5 innings, but at only 53 pitches. I think he got through the 4th at only 37 pitches. 2 walks, 1 wild pitch, and 1 single is it. The strike-throwing version of Franklin is pretty interesting.
  10. craig
    When Cassie gets them, he sometimes really hits them! Interesting that yesterday was on a pitch, top of the strike zone or else a little above it, this one a low strike.
  11. craig
    Ferris looks like a pretty big guy. Kinda weird in those clips, turns his back and walks away after a couple of those swinging K's, even when the ball is bouncing free and Ballesteros is scrambling to recover it and throw the guys out. Not sure I recall big-league pitchers doing that.
  12. craig
    Oquendo with 5K in 2 perfect innings. Two innings without a walk!
  13. craig
    Wicks with 5 HR in 41 innings, he was a bomber last year too. I'm guessing that might just always be part of the profile, you take the good with alittle bad?? A guy throwing a lot of breaking-ball strikes, and will probably always inevitably hang a few? Or maybe a guy without a big fastball, as a strike-throwing guy he has the courage to throw a lot for strikes; but some will inevitably get a little too much of the plate? Or, maybe some of his under-development pitches just have some mistakes, but in time those mistakes will get fewer?
  14. craig
    Yeah, I wonder about that? I suspect the 6-day rotation combined with no-Monday games provides some flexibility. Skip a start, and make sure a 1st-year-pro is super rested and never pitches a tired inning? Or is that maybe an opportunity for some developmental stuff? 12-day cycle, get several side-sessions in between box score starts, and maybe work on tweaking or adding something? Spring training goes so fast, maybe guy worked on some new or adjusted pitch, but didn't actually use it in first month of games? But maybe with 3-4 side-sessions to work on it, you come back after the 12 days and start using something new? Draft scouting suggested he was mostly fastball/slider, and change wasn't used much, and then only to lefties. Maybe touched that up some? Or maybe cutter of some kind added?
  15. craig
    Why was Herz not with a club?
  16. craig
    Tom, your support for Gallardo hasn't been fully supported in past years. For the moment, you deserve full, due credit! Lets see how the K's and HR's go moving forward. Hope this becomes increasingly normal.
  17. craig
    Gallardo best game of his career. 7K/0BB, 9/1 GO/AO. Last year, he allowed 17HR in only 122 innings, really scary in the minors where not a lot of power hitters. This year, 0HR. Not sure what to make of that, but I'm hoping the new no-HR guy is real. HR-factory or not can make all the difference.
  18. craig
    What was Herz extended for? An injury? Or developmental work, some modifications to help enable him to throw strikes?
  19. craig
    I haven't been tracking all of the games and evenings. You're saying he was 93 tonight in the cold and wasn't quite getting it past guys? Whereas previous outing he was 95+ and was getting some up-fastball swing-and-miss? Helpful info, assuming I'm understanding it correctly, thanks.
  20. craig
    Fun to have Horton dominating. And fun to have a good-stuff pitcher who might have good control.
  21. craig
    Speaking of vanished players, has Chris Clarke reappeared? I don't believe he's appeared in a box score since the Cubs got him back from Seattle. Injured? Pitch-labbing in Mesa?
  22. craig
    That's neat that Burl is healthy enough to resume his career. I wonder how much of his time away has been injury-related, and how much has been rebuilding his delivery and everything about it that made him hopelessly wild? Would be kinda cool for him personally if he could regain some success, rebuild some confidence, and re-establish some career as a minor-league pitcher. It would be an especially fun human-interest story if he actually somehow turned into an actual. big-league prospect to take seriously. Time will tell.
  23. craig
    Tom, thanks for Myrtle video with all the Ks. Arias looks really electric; can see how he'd be wilder than wild, though. Not sure I'd think many 1-walk outings will show up. Agree that Oquendo looks interesting.
  24. craig
    When a Latin kid is signed with SS his listed position, but he gets an insignificant signing bonus, it sometimes reflects that he's a 5'10 kid who lacks the levers and the bat speed to hit for power. There can be an Altuve for sure. But there aren't many middle-of-the-order power guys in big-league lineups who are <6 feet. The physics of short levers just doesn't support power for short guys, unless they have both exceptional bat speed and exceptional contact capacity. I knew Lubo was a low-$$ signing, so I suspected he might be one of those short guys who might not really have serious big-league power potential. But at 6'2", I think that's pretty ideal for perhaps having a frame to support power, and levers to support power. I know the 6'4-6'6" guys can have really nice long levers to have great BP power. The physics velocity can be great.... when the swing path meets the ball. But I often think that when the levers get too long, it's just harder to make the solid contact required for HR's. So I'm kinda cautious about real long-levered guys, and often think being more 6'2"-ish makes it a little bit easier to end up as a high-volume HR-hitter than being 5'10" or 6'6".
  25. craig
    At 6'2", it's not like Lubo is too short to have real power potential. Lubo was in the Cristian Hernandez/Ballesteros year. Obviously they commanded all of the cash, so he would have been one of the cheap don't-count-against-cap signings . He's from San Pedro de Marcos, not some obscure country town with limited scouting. Would be fun to have him blossom into a real hitter.
×
×
  • Create New...