No, sac bunting is wrong. Batting Neifi in the 2 hole is wrong. Letting Murton swing away is not wrong. It might not always work, because that's baseball. And a sac bunt might occasionally work, because that's baseball. But the odds are against you and it's absolutely foolish to keep sac bunting the way Dusty does. just curious. what is the percentage breakdown? how much of a better chance of a run is there, if you don't bunt? There's a great link for this that was posted in one of the game threads the other day....I hope someone has it...cuz I'm too lazy to find it. :P i remember someone posting it. Unfortunately, baker makes a sweeping generalization that sacrificing a runner over is good at all times. I think the same sweeping genearlization holds for those adamantly opposed to the bunt tho. Jmo but it's highly dependent on the situation. There is one situation in which bunting is almost always the best option: when there's a runner on 2nd with no outs and you need to score just one run. There's a 3-part study on BP by James Click that's worth reading. If you don't have a BP subscription, this free article at the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette applies the Click research to the Pirates: http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/04146/321576.stm