Sure they do. The end result of both seasons was a very, very poor playoff "performance" where the team simply failed to compete on any level in any capacity of the game. These are not robots out there. Psychology is a giant portion of human beings. You can't just ignore external factors and how they play upon a team. Many players have said there is "extra pressure" due to not winning a world series in 100 years. Is this true? Maybe. We wouldn't know unless we were those players in that playoff series. A team that repeatedly chokes while maintaining the same group of core performance leaders is certainly succeptible to a saturation of their psyche. If you were at your job, and every year you did well in sales, but at the big convention you lost ten major accounts(and you repeated this for several years), do you honestly think this would not affect you psychologically or in terms of your overall performance in that field? My solution to improve the Cubs offense: Play the remaining ~100 games in the season. Sales analogy: who cares about my psychology...the results show that I suck at sales, so I'd expect continued failures whether or not psychology has a thing to do with it. The fans are the ones susceptible to said saturation. Because you know NOTHING about the "failure to compete". They weren't trying to suck. They just did. And do, however a large part of this is also attributable to luck. Also, I'd say that Lou's failure to take Dempster out after 7 walks certainly did not help matters, in last year's playoff opener. Starting Dempster in and of itself was very stupid. Zambrano is the guy you gave all the money to. He's our ace. He should have pitched the most important game of the series.