Jump to content
North Side Baseball

OleMissCub

Old-Timey Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    38,741

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by OleMissCub

  1. OleMissCub
    omg yes do that. I wish I could get rid of Johnson in my league, but I doubt anyone will take his ass at this point.
  2. OleMissCub
    Looks dumb with his visor too
  3. OleMissCub
    Maybe a fast food seafood chain logo. haha, precisely
  4. OleMissCub
    I don't think anybody here had a problem with the legality of the hits on Cutler, merely the frequency. however, the hit on Bennett was certainly questionable.the hit/flag on Cutler just looked like a make-up call, if there are such things I'll agree with that. Talked to a buddy of mine who is a college ref and he said basically the same thing that troubled me with that Harper hit on Cutler, basically that Harper had no way of knowing that Cut didn't still have the ball in his hands since he got rid of it simultaneously with the hit.
  5. OleMissCub
    fwiw...
  6. OleMissCub
    http://i255.photobucket.com/albums/hh153/OleMissCub17/machetebrees.gif
  7. OleMissCub
    I'll gladly take A&M and Mizzou in my division of the SEC if we can get rid of one of the stud teams, in that case it looks like Auburn due to geography (it's pretty much in Georgia for those that don't know)
  8. OleMissCub
    BEEN THERE same. Did you have to have someone you were with straighten your leg out so your knee would go back in place? So effed up to see your knee not where it is supposed to be.
  9. OleMissCub
    Yeah, agreed. Though I found his Bears didn't earn the first TD shtick funny and odd. That was supposed to be tongue in cheek. Hard to tell tone in the written word I suppose. And I'm not sure how I was overly antagonistic after the game. The only thing I really commented on post game was to defend the assertion that somehow the Saints weren't any good, which I found odd considering they just beat up the Bears and nearly beat the Packers last week. Ahh, my bad on that. Yeah I mean, you could pretty much say that about every TD scoring drive.
  10. OleMissCub
    Yeah, agreed. Though I found his Bears didn't earn the first TD shtick funny and odd. That was supposed to be tongue in cheek. Hard to tell tone in the written word I suppose. And I'm not sure how I was overly antagonistic after the game. The only thing I really commented on post game was to defend the assertion that somehow the Saints weren't any good, which I found odd considering they just beat up the Bears and nearly beat the Packers last week.
  11. OleMissCub
    Cowboys fan should GTFO. This thread is Bears only.
  12. OleMissCub
    I'm sure it would have been fine if y'all had won... Aren't you the guy a few months ago who brought up the 2006 NFC Champ Game Thread? Saying how fun the back and forth was? But I guess that was OK because the Bears won. And I like you guys, that's why I posted here instead of the other place. I don't post all that often on the Saints forum. I mainly just make the gifs. This is a CUBS forum after all and while I'm very aware the amount of Bears people, I wasn't aware it was an exclusive thread. I thought you people accepted that I was going to post in the Bears/Saints threads like I always had and none of you took issue in the last week while I was posting here. But again, you lost this time, so it's some terrible crime. But ya, sorry you lost.
  13. OleMissCub
    I'm hardly trolling. I've had a back and forth with my Bears friends on NSBB since the 2006 game (except for you because it appears you've only been here two years). Second, I'm pretty sure the other posters are doing a fine job defending themselves and are grown ups enough to handle it.
  14. OleMissCub
    Of course they are good team They handled a good Falcons team pretty dang well last week; played in the NFC Champ game last week. And even if I didn't think they were a good team, I'd still act like they were because it makes the Saints look better to beat a good team. That's why I don't understand all the negativity about the Saints around here. Seems like if you got beat up in a game you'd want it to at least be a good team that beat you.
  15. OleMissCub
    What does that say about your Bears if the Saints look unimpressive to you? Are the Bears the worst team in the NFL or something? Would the Saints have to have scored 60 points to be considered good? 10 Seahawks > 10 Saints BURN! Just using your logic. No you aren't. First, I wouldn't have said the Seahawks looked unimpressive if they had just beat the crap out of the Saints. Second, I fail to see how the Saints look unimpressive when they gave arguably the best team in football a fight to the finish in their own house last week and then dominated the Bears this week. The only thing about them so far that was unimpressive was their D last week, but of course that was against the Packers, so who knows. All of football knows the D is their weakness anyways. It's not like this was some fluke victory. The Saints are one of the better teams in football and have been for several years now. Seems like sour grapes to me.
  16. OleMissCub
    What does that say about your Bears if the Saints look unimpressive to you? Are the Bears the worst team in the NFL or something? Would the Saints have to have scored 60 points to be considered good? 10 Seahawks > 10 Saints BURN!
  17. OleMissCub
    It was comedic. They suck bags of ass.
  18. OleMissCub
    What does that say about your Bears if the Saints look unimpressive to you? Are the Bears the worst team in the NFL or something? Would the Saints have to have scored 60 points to be considered good?
  19. OleMissCub
    I wouldn't be too worried. I mean, the Saints almost beat the Packers and judging by what I've read today the Bears are still much better than the Saints, so if they nearly beat the Pack, then the Bears have a good chance too. You are a real tool. Sorry your guys sucked today. And I actually mean that. It's not fun to watch your team lose and your franchise QB getting killed.
  20. OleMissCub
    I'm aware things change going from away/home, but you guys keep talking about how bad your line is, so I wasn't aware that playing at home made them suddenly become a good line.
  21. OleMissCub
    I figured you'd be wanting passes right now. Incompletions stop the clock and gives you a better chance for a TO.
  22. OleMissCub
    I wouldn't be too worried. I mean, the Saints almost beat the Packers and judging by what I've read today the Bears are still much better than the Saints, so if they nearly beat the Pack, then the Bears have a good chance too.
  23. OleMissCub
    Never forget!! I will never forget how bad they used to be. Before Payton and Brees came along they were only half-good like twice in my previous 25 years.
  24. OleMissCub
    Alas! Sept 11, 2005:
  25. OleMissCub
    In the dome yeah. Still not convinced they are better if we were a home. your line would have played 3 times as good at home or something?
×
×
  • Create New...