Jump to content
North Side Baseball

Flames24Rulz

Old-Timey Member
  • Posts

    20,777
  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Profiles

Joomla Posts 1

Chicago Cubs Videos

Chicago Cubs Free Agent & Trade Rumors, Notes, & Tidbits

2026 Chicago Cubs Top Prospects Ranking

News

2023 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

Guides & Resources

2024 Chicago Cubs Draft Picks

The Chicago Cubs Players Project

2025 Chicago Cubs Draft Pick Tracker

2026 Chicago Cubs Draft Tracker: Picks & Bonuses

Blogs

Events

Forums

Store

Gallery

Everything posted by Flames24Rulz

  1. This is absolutely ridiculous. It should be at LEAST 17-0 Cardinals.
  2. WHAT?
  3. BALL!!!!!!!!
  4. So apparently fumbles can be lost. Arizona should've had the damn ball inside the Dallas 30. This is a joke.
  5. I guess there must not be very many "good" teams in college football if Missouri "isn't very good."
  6. The Jets should be blowing out Cincy, but Favre just threw his 2nd INT inside the Bengals 5 yard line.
  7. Sounds like the same exact thing we went through last week against the Falcons.
  8. That was awesome.
  9. This is very much true. At this point, I'd probably re-sign Dempster. I think he will be pretty affordable. The Cubs potentially lose Harden, Lilly and Marquis after 09. That leaves a rotation and Zambrano and ? The Cubs aren't going to get Sabathia or the like. Even if Dempster isn't as effective as he was this year as a starter, he should still be around league average at worst. Worst case scenario, you have a pitcher with some pretty good success as a short reliever. No, but it's fun to dream...it's fun to dream. I think Derek Lowe could be someone that we would have interest in. A groundball pitcher at Wrigley? Count me in.
  10. That's what I've been trying to say, but you explained it much clearer.
  11. Ah, I KNEW something was missing from the college football season. Now with that post, the college football season is complete and I can enjoy the rest of the season in peace. Why is it a bad idea to judge stats in baseball when you have a small sample but when it's football, it's alright? They're two completely different sports. In football, everything is a small sample size because there's only 12-13 games where in baseball there's 162. I understand the sample size in baseball thing, but the sample size in football is the entire regular season. But how do you get a proper, clear idea based on W-L of such a small sample? Team A in a BCS conference has 0 zero losses. Team B in a BCS conference has 1 loss. Team A should be ranked ahead of team B. You can only control who you beat on your schedule. The Big 12 is better than the SEC anyways. I agree on everything except the schedule part because we all know you can control your OOC portion. That being said, the best team that Florida played out of conference was a pretty bad Miami team. Oklahoma State's best OOC game was against an average Houston team. Okie State has scored over 50 points in all of their games except the opener (where they scored 39) and tonight. I know Meph will disagree, but at worst I believe the Big 12 and SEC are equal. I'm really not seeing where it's such a bad thing to have the Cowboys ranked over Florida.
  12. Ah, I KNEW something was missing from the college football season. Now with that post, the college football season is complete and I can enjoy the rest of the season in peace. Why is it a bad idea to judge stats in baseball when you have a small sample but when it's football, it's alright? They're two completely different sports. In football, everything is a small sample size because there's only 12-13 games where in baseball there's 162. I understand the sample size in baseball thing, but the sample size in football is the entire regular season.
  13. Ah, I KNEW something was missing from the college football season. Now with that post, the college football season is complete and I can enjoy the rest of the season in peace.
  14. My Erin Andrews moment was better than yours. It's all good
  15. BYU and Utah haven't lost a game. Those others have. That's what polls go by, not who's better than who. which is why the BCS was invented, because the polls are horrible and wrong No one's saying they're not. But as of October 11th, 2008, BYU and Utah deserve to be ranked higher than those teams. they dont deserve to be ranked higher because theyre not better football teams. rankings are supposed to rank teams by if the two teams played the next day on the field, who would be better. As evident by your Meph polls last year when you had a 3 loss Florida team over several other 1 loss teams that were more deserving. How did that work out for Florida last year? Everything in college football (for the most part) is all speculative. You can say one team is better than another, but there's so few games that you really can't tell who would win a game one on one. I'm not saying the ranking process is necessarily fair, but that's just the way it is. An LSU team that lost 30 points to Florida should not be ranked ahead of an undefeated BYU and an undefeated Utah team. That just doesn't make any sense. Down with the non-BCS schools!
  16. BYU and Utah haven't lost a game. Those others have. That's what polls go by, not who's better than who. which is why the BCS was invented, because the polls are horrible and wrong No one's saying they're not. But as of October 11th, 2008, BYU and Utah deserve to be ranked higher than those teams.
  17. Who has Okie State lost to this year? They went on the road in a very hostile environment at night and beat Missouri. Florida had a very impressive win, no doubt. Take care of business against Ole Miss and you won't have to worry about rankings.
  18. BYU and Utah haven't lost a game. Those others have. That's what polls go by, not who's better than who.
  19. Flames24Rulz would like to post my name alongside yours on that poll. Good work, I agree with basically all of that. god thats terrible I love posts that criticize other posts but they don't actually say why it's terrible. Care to explain? Your boys are ranked #1, you should be happy.
  20. Flames24Rulz would like to post my name alongside yours on that poll. Good work, I agree with basically all of that.
  21. You looked that up, didn't you? No. I know Chance Mock and remember the bowl game. Remember the Alamo.
  22. You looked that up, didn't you?
  23. 2 games. On the road. I love excuses. For sure, the Hawks are gonna go 0-82 now. Never said that, but surely expecting a win when you're up 2-0 is improbable.
  24. 2 games. On the road. I love excuses.
×
×
  • Create New...