Ah, I KNEW something was missing from the college football season. Now with that post, the college football season is complete and I can enjoy the rest of the season in peace. Why is it a bad idea to judge stats in baseball when you have a small sample but when it's football, it's alright? They're two completely different sports. In football, everything is a small sample size because there's only 12-13 games where in baseball there's 162. I understand the sample size in baseball thing, but the sample size in football is the entire regular season. But how do you get a proper, clear idea based on W-L of such a small sample? Team A in a BCS conference has 0 zero losses. Team B in a BCS conference has 1 loss. Team A should be ranked ahead of team B. You can only control who you beat on your schedule. The Big 12 is better than the SEC anyways. I agree on everything except the schedule part because we all know you can control your OOC portion. That being said, the best team that Florida played out of conference was a pretty bad Miami team. Oklahoma State's best OOC game was against an average Houston team. Okie State has scored over 50 points in all of their games except the opener (where they scored 39) and tonight. I know Meph will disagree, but at worst I believe the Big 12 and SEC are equal. I'm really not seeing where it's such a bad thing to have the Cowboys ranked over Florida.