My goodness, that's an awful comparison. Why? they are the same type of player-passive, non run producing for a production position and mediocre defensively. You may like that type, but Lou doesn't. I'm not saying either opinion is right or wrong, but they are very similiar. That's so vague it's not even worth making a comparison, even if you include the cliched terms used(what is passive?). vague comparisons are better than no comparisons, which is what you have given. Grieve, after a similar amount of PAs as Murton currently has, had slightly better walk rate and slightly better power (albeit at a younger age). Murton has a little more speed and defensive ability. the comparison might not be exact, but their skill sets and short comings are very similar. and even if they weren't, outright statements without explanation, argument or analysis like the two you have made in this discussion suck. Outright statements without explanation, argument, or analysis? That sounds like saying Murton is a RH Ben Grieve and then not elaborating or responding with vague, subjective statements. Murton makes contact more often(lower K rate) and better contact more often(better AVG). Grieve was three true outcomes to the extreme, he saw more pitches, struck out more often, and hit more home runs. On the other hand, this comparison to Grieve is supposed to be a negative one, while anyone would want what Grieve put up his first 3 seasons in the league out of Murton, or anyone in our outfield for that matter. The comparision is meant to show why he isn't playing. Lou has had both and sees the similiarity and doesn't happen to like that kind of player. It is very simple.