I can only assume at this point that it makes TOO much sense for Lou and Hendry. It's such an obvious move that they automatically don't trust it, and kind of fear it. I never thought of that, but that's the most likely explanation. It's too good to be true - we can't possibly have a great offense with a young guy struggling to adjust to the majors, so it must not be possible, even though logic dictates that our total offense wouldn't suffer if your replaced a horribly-performing vet with a less-horribly-performing young player. I'm ultimately at a loss to explain it. I don't think they're stupid men...surely they can look at stats and see that Felix so far this year would at least match the horrible performances they've gotten from Edmonds and Johnson against RHP. Why is it tolerated out of veterans, but it's completely unacceptable ad treated as if it's "hurting the team" if it's a kid learning the ropes who has shown after he adjusts he succeeds at every level so far? There's asbolutely no logical excuse. I wonder what it is that we are all missing? Is there a hidden (to outsiders) character/work ethic issue - hence the need to play up Sam Fuld as a viable option, bring in Reed Johnson, sign Edmonds? Or is all of this really an innate Cub management distrust of Pie's skills? If they really distrust his skills, then it would seem logical to trade him to a team that believes in him while his value is high. Or do the Cubs really not buy into minor league stats? Is Hendry hoping that winning now with Soto (and Theriot) absolves his bigger player development failures? I am at a complete loss with the Pie saga, and as it seems, so are many others.