so just because you didn't think they'd be good, the fact that they were means it was luck? i don't get what you're saying. i'm really surprised by all the white sox hate here. i don't know how anyone can deny that kw has done better than hendry over the past few years. kw is working w/ a lower payroll, an armpit of a stadium that they can't fill, and a rookie manager. hendry has a huge payroll, one of the most beloved stadiums filled w/ fans, and supposedly one of the best managers in baseball. yet the white sox won the WS and the cubs finished in 4th place. come on...things are looking pretty good for the white sox right now, and the last two years of hendry has been nothing short of a big fat F. and to everybody clamoring about how the sox were lucky...does everyone remember what type of hitter dlee was before he flirted w/ .400 and the triple crown? or what kind of hitter barrett was before he became the best offensive catcher in the nl? or what type of pitcher dempster was before he became one of the best closers in baseball last season? how about murton hitting .320 straight from AA? ramirez going from flop to stud? Nope. You missed it entirely, my friend. I said that the Yankees, Boston and St. Louis were better teams than the White Sox last year. That's it. Nothing more. That's still giving them credit for having the 4th best team in baseball. That's nothing to sneeze at. I gave KW credit, and I said he's had a great offseason so far this year. And it had very little to do with luck. I have a question for you. Going into the 2005 season, could you honestly (and I do mean honestly) tell me that the White Sox starting pitchers (Buehrle, Garland, Contreras, El Duque and Garcia) were going to have a better season than (Randy Johnson, Mike Mussina, Carl Pavano, Jaret Wright and Shawn Chacon) or (Curt Schilling, Matt Clement, Wade Miller, Tim Wakefield and David Wells)?