Fred, are you saying this is a trade the Cubs should do? No, not at all. My conversation with Vance began with his assumption that it would come to pass. I'm not in favor of this trade in any way. Ah! Cool. The whole thing seems so ridiculous. Last year, Hendry wanted to be rid of Sammy so bad, he gave him away for a utility guy and a couple of prospects while paying nearly all of Sosa's contract. This year, Baltimore is about to fleece the Cubs again when there doesn't seem to be even the slightest reason to do so. At the trade deadline last year, Hendry was so enamored with Rich Hill, he wouldn't have traded him straight up for Adam Dunn. Now we're offering Mark Prior AND Rich Hill along with Patterson for Tejada and used or spare parts. Why? If Hendry is honestly dangling Prior, he needs to let the other 28 teams in the league know what he's doing so that they can line up with better offers. Of course, I'd just as soon see Prior remain a Cub and trade prospects to beef up the rotation. He dropped the ball on upgrading the offense. Now is not the time to trade from a strength to patch a weakness.